Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9196721

The scintillating grid illusion.

M Schrauf·B Lingelbach·E R Wist
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Disk-shaped luminance increments were added to the intersections of a Hermann grid consisting of medium grey bars on a black background. Illusory spots, darker than the background, were perceived as flashing within the white disks with each flick of the eye. This striking phenomenon may be referred to as the scintillating grid illusion. We determined the conditions necessary for cancelling the Hermann grid illusion, as well as the luminance requirements and the size ratio between disks and bars that elicits the scintillation effect. The fact that scanning eye movements are necessary to produce the scintillation effect sets it apart from the Hermann grid illusion.

Explore related subjects

Eye MovementsFemaleHumansLightingMaleNeural InhibitionOptical IllusionsPattern Recognition, VisualPhotometryJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Schrauf, B Lingelbach, E R Wist. 1997. The scintillating grid illusion.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00255-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

One of the most important functions of vision is to direct actions to objects. However, every time that vision is used to guide an action, retinal motion signals are produced by the movement of the eye and head as the person looks at the object or by the motion of other objects in the scene. To reach for the object accurately, the visuomotor system must separate information about the position of the stationary target from background retinal motion signals-a long-standing problem that is poorly understood. Here we show that the visuomotor system does not distinguish between these two information sources: when observers made fast reaching movements to a briefly presented stationary target, their hand shifted in a direction consistent with the motion of a distant and unrelated stimulus, a result contrary to most other findings. This can be seen early in the hand's trajectory (approximately 120 ms) and occurs continuously from programming of the movement through to its execution. The visuomotor system might make use of the motion signals arising from eye and head movements to update the positions of targets rapidly and redirect the hand to compensate for body movements.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed2003

Motion perception during involuntary eye vibration.

Retinal motion caused by reflexive or voluntary eye movements is rarely misinterpreted as object motion, as if the visual system discounted the contribution of these eye movements to retinal motion. Yet, involuntary eye movements caused by mechanical eye vibration is often interpreted as object motion unless the vibration has high frequency, in which case only image blur may be noticed. In these latter conditions, however, a light flickering above the fusion limit is vividly perceived to undergo oscillatory motion over its static surround. We determined the conditions of this phenomenon, showing that the perceived frequency of illusory oscillation equals the difference between flicker frequency and the frequency of vibration of the eyes. This outcome is explained as a result of the low-pass temporal frequency characteristic of vision, which further predicts that the same effect should occur if the flickering light is vibrated and observed with static eyes. This prediction was corroborated empirically. We also determined the minimal amplitude of oscillation required to perceive motion as a function of postural stability and the presence of static references, finding an amplitude threshold of approximately 1 arcmin with postural stability in dim-light conditions, which increases to approximately 2 arcmin with postural instability in the dark.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed2003

Exocentric pointing to opposite targets.

We use an exocentric pointing task to study exocentric visual directions to targets that are opposite to a pointer relative to the observer. (The apparent distance between the target and the pointer always exceeded 90 degrees of visual angle.) All pointing takes place in the horizontal plane at eye height. Observers could not see both target and pointer at a single glance. They had to look back and forth between them, using combinations of eye movements, head turns, twists at the waist and turning on the feet. In the limit of diametrically opposite targets we find that the observers pick either one of two distinct orientations of the pointer as equally "visually correct". Which one results depends on the stance assumed by the observer. The difference between the two equally acceptable pointings is between 5 degrees and 10 degrees. Such a result is predicted from earlier measurements in the context of a model that describes the geometry of the horizon as a Riemannian space with varying intrinsic curvature. The present results thus fit--perhaps surprisingly--very well in such a picture.

Eye Movements↗