Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9194782

Sutureless technique: second version.

Abstract

Mesh repairs have revolutionized hernia surgery. When used to patch or plug a musculoaponeurotic abdominal wall defect, the results have been much better than traditional pure tissue repairs. The difference is simple: patch and plug techniques avoid tension on tissues. The improved sutureless repair not only avoids tissue tension, it obviates the need to suture the mesh. Fixation is achieved by intra-abdominal pressure, the same force that caused the hernia. Thorough dissection of the inguinal canal and the indirect sac is essential to avoid early failure. Whereas various repairs can be used with excellent results, there is no substitute for a complete dissection of the peritoneal sac well into the iliac fossa. The improved sutureless repair offers 2 advantages over the original version: (a) type III hernias can now be repaired without opening the canal's posterior wall, and (b) the incidence of clinically evident seroma has been reduced by 90%. Most primary and recurrent groin hernias can be repaired under local or regional anesthesia on an outpatient basis. Immediate ambulation and prompt recovery accompany this technique. Most patients resume full activity and employment by the end of the first week. The procedure is simple to learn, easy to perform and less costly than other techniques.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A I Gilbert, M F Graham. 1997. Sutureless technique: second version.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9194782/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How best to fix a broken hip. Fractured Neck of Femur Health Outcomes Project Team.

OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures to optimise functional outcome while minimising length of stay in hospital. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature search of MEDLINE and CINAHL computer databases, bibliographies, and current contents of key journals for 1966-1995. STUDY SELECTION: English-language randomised controlled trials of all aspects of acute-care hospital treatment of proximal femoral fracture among subjects aged 50 years and over with proximal femoral fractures not due to metastatic disease. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers, blinded to authors, institution and study results, followed a standard Cochrane Collaboration protocol and assessed study quality and treatment conclusions. When necessary, a third review was performed to reach consensus. RESULTS: Of the 120 articles published between 1966 and December 1995, 97 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen clinical interventions were reviewed. Five were supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) level I evidence (prophylactic anticoagulants, prophylactic antibiotics, regional anaesthesia, pressure-relieving mattresses, and internal surgical fixation), two had no supporting randomised controlled trial evidence (time to surgery, time to mobilisation after surgery) and the remainder were classified as having Level II evidence. A review of current practice (1993-94) identified wide variability in these interventions across five acute-care hospitals in the Northern Sydney Area Health Service. CONCLUSIONS: Randomised controlled trial evidence (NHMRC Levels I and II) exists for many, but not all, aspects of hip fracture treatment. There is a need for changes to be made to some aspects of practice in accordance with evidence-based guidelines.

Anesthesia, Conduction