Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9192569

Perceived barriers in reporting medication administration errors.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assuring that medication administration error (MAE) reports are reliable and valid is of great significance for the patient, the hospital, and the nurse. In most hospitals, MAE reporting relies on the nurse who discovers an error to initiate an error report, whether the error was committed by that nurse or someone else. Because of the potential for negative consequences, there may be significant disincentives for the nurse to report the error. This, the first of two articles, describes the results of a large-scale survey designed to assess nurses' perceptions of the reasons why MAE may not be reported. The companion article compares nurses' estimates of the extent to which MAEs are reported with the actual reported medication error rates. METHODS: Nurses in 24 acute-care hospitals were surveyed to determine perceptions of reasons why medication errors may not be reported. RESULTS: The factor analysis reveals four factors explaining why staff nurses may not report medication errors: fear, disagreement over whether an error occurred, administrative responses to medication errors, and effort required to report MAEs. CONCLUSIONS: There are potential changes in both systems and management responses to MAEs that could improve current practice. These changes need to take into account the influences of organizational, professional, and work group culture.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D S Wakefield, B J Wakefield, T Uden-Holman, M A Blegen. Perceived barriers in reporting medication administration errors.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9192569/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future needs.

Spontaneous reporting systems like MEDWATCH can be effective in revealing unusual or rare adverse events that occur with the use of medications, and such reports may often be sufficient to assign causality. However, spontaneous reports do not reliably detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that occur widely separated in time from the original use of the drug or that represent an increased risk of an adverse event that occurs commonly in populations not exposed to the drug. In these situations, spontaneous reports alone do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the adverse event was an ADR. Identification of ADRs associated with long-term administration of drugs for chronic diseases also remains problematic. Methods to evaluate ADRs using data from clinical trials, medical records, and computerized databases of medication users and nonusers must be developed to complement spontaneous reporting systems. Without these methods, potentially important ADRs will remain undetected, and spurious associations between adverse outcomes and medications or devices will remain unchallenged.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems

Serious surveillance.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems