Flow chart to benchmark.

M W Corbett

PubMed · 9192564

Flow chart to benchmark.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is the process used to search for best-in-class, compare results, discover the enablers of superior process performance, and take action to achieve quantum process improvement. It sounds simple, but all too often benchmarking efforts fail. The first obstacle often is failing to understand how work is currently being performed. METHODS: Through linear flow charts, connection charts, and cross-functional flow charts, teams identify each step in a process, see how the people in the process interact, follow the work flow, and label the type of a step. When this is accompanied by supporting documentation, this method provides teams a way to visually see the work flow and know where there are glitches and where things are going well. RESULTS: Through flow charting, benchmarking teams can understand what they are doing so they know what to look for in a benchmarking partner and how to identify the enablers of a superior performance. CONCLUSIONS: Without flow charting, teams will not get the maximum benefit from benchmarking.

Explore related subjects

Appointments and Schedules Audiovisual Aids Hospital-Patient Relations Humans Interdepartmental Relations Management Quality Circles Problem Solving Process Assessment, Health Care Software Design Total Quality Management Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M W Corbett. Flow chart to benchmark.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9192564/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Post-operative review.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Appointments and Schedules↗

PubMed1999

A survey of dental practitioners on their use of electronic mail.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of using electronic-mail as a tool for surveying dental practitioners; to determine both response rates and response times for this method; and provide baseline information on e-mail usage. METHOD: Self-administered questionnaire distributed by e-mail to 309 practitioners on Monday morning, 1 June 1998. RESULTS: 53.4% response rate within 1 month; 10.2% of replies were sent within 2 hours; and nearly half the replies were sent within 48 hours. Qualified dentists were more likely to respond early than undergraduates. The most popular point of access for e-mail was home (69.1%). The majority of responders (56.8%) use e-mail every day with 1 in 7 (14.2%) using it at least four times a day. 72.4% stated that they found e-mail useful for communicating with professional bodies, while 41.3% used it to communicate with colleagues about patients and patient referrals. 34.0% found e-mail useful for ordering goods, and supplies and 14.6% were using electronic mail to make patient appointments at least some of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Responses can be obtained at much greater speed than conventional postal techniques will allow, but response rates were only 53.4%. E-mail is predominately used at home and for inter-professional communications, only a small proportion of responders use it for direct communication with patients.

Appointments and Schedules↗

PubMed1999

ED overcrowding in Taiwan: facts and strategies.

The objective of this study was to quantity the extent of emergency department (ED) overcrowding in Taiwan and to identify possible solutions. The ED log was reviewed for all patients who presented to the National Taiwan University Hospital's ED from January 16, 1996 through February 15, 1996. Charts from patients held longer than 72 hours were reviewed. Among 5,810 patients, 213 (3.6%) were held in the ED for more than 72 hours (7.1 patients per day). In 149 (70.0%) of them, admission was indicated but delayed (42 because more than one subspecialty were involved, 57 because of unavailability of bed, and 50 because of the disparity in admission priority between the emergency physicians and house staffs). Eighteen (8.4%) patients did not meet admission criteria (13 could have been treated in outpatient clinics, 3 needed placement in nursing homes, 2 because of personal problems). The others (22%) recovered while waiting. Significant overcrowding exists in EDs in Taiwan. Four solutions are proposed: (1) creation of a holding unit; (2) flexible ward assignment; (3) pre-established rules for admission priority-setting; and (4) active interfacility transfer. Only through these efforts can EDs in Taiwan guarantee an optimal level of care in the face of a growing patient demand.

Appointments and Schedules↗