Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 9168511

Croup.

Abstract

The management of mild to severe croup has undergone dramatic changes in the last 5 years, primarily due to the increased understanding of the benefits of treating it with steroids. Steroids have been used in the treatment of croup for many years, but, until recently, their use has remained controversial. Earlier studies were often not blinded or used inappropriate outcome measures, such as respiratory rate, which have not proven appropriate. Two attempts to review the literature in 1980 and 1989 cautiously supported the use of steroids. Despite these recommendations many practitioners continued to view croup in most cases as a benign self-limited condition, and since steroids have potential side-effects, their use was not considered justified. More recently, however, a number of developments such as the successful use of the inhaled steroid budesonide and oral dexamethasone have reinforced the argument for using steroids. Recent work has also shown that both inhaled and systemic steroids work by 1 hour and dramatically reduce morbidity and hospitalization time. The demonstration that an oral dose of 0.15 mg/kg dexamethasone is as effective as larger doses has made the use of systemic steroids more acceptable to many practitioners. All children with croup severe enough to be admitted to hospital should receive steroids. Two recent studies have shown that steroids also benefitted children who presented to emergency departments for treatment, but whose croup was not considered severe enough for admission. The type of steroid, the dose, and the mode of administration will need to be decided by the attending clinician.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G C Geelhoed. 1997. Croup.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199705)23%3A5%3C370%3A%3Aaid-ppul9%3E3.0.co%3B2-o

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Aerosolized amphotericin B inhalations as prophylaxis of invasive aspergillus infections during prolonged neutropenia: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

We performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic inhalations with aerosolized amphotericin B (aeroAmB) to reduce the incidence of invasive aspergillus (IA) infections in patients after chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplantation and an expected duration of neutropenia of at least 10 days. From March 1993 until April 1996, 382 patients with leukemias, relapsed high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas, or solid tumors were randomized with a 13:10 ratio to receive either prophylactic aeroAmB inhalations at a dose of 10 mg twice daily or no inhalation prophylaxis in an unblinded fashion. The incidence of proven, probable, or possible IA infections was 10 of 227 (4%) in patients who received prophylactic aeroAmB. This did not differ significantly from the 11 of 155 (7%) incidence in patients who received no inhalation prophylaxis (P =.37). Moreover, no differences in the overall mortality (13% v 10%; P =.37) or in the infection-related mortality (8% v 7%; P =.79) were found. In contrast to other nonrandomized trials, we observed no benefit from prophylactic aeroAmB inhalations, but the overall incidence of IA infections was low.

Administration, Inhalation

Regulation of pulmonary T cell responses to inhaled antigen: role in Th1- and Th2-mediated inflammation.

DO11.10 transgenic mice, expressing an OVA-specific TCR, were used to study pulmonary T cell responses to inhaled Ags. Before OVA inhalation, the activation of lung parenchymal T cells elicited both strong proliferative responses and IL-2 production. However, following Ag inhalation the proliferative responses of the lung T cells, when restimulated in vitro with OVA323-339 peptide or immobilized anti-CD3, were severely attenuated and associated with a decrease in the level of production of IL-2 but not IFN-gamma. Such immune regulation was tissue-specific, because T cell responses in the lymph nodes and spleens were normal. This dramatic aerosol-induced attenuation of parenchymal T cell proliferation was also observed in BALB/c mice immunized with OVA and in BALB/c mice following adoptive transfer of DO11.10 T cells bearing either a Th1 or Th2 phenotype. In mice that had received Th2 cells, the reduced proliferative responses were associated with a decrease in IL-2 expression but augmented IL-4 and IL-5 production. Invariably, the inhibition of proliferation was a consequence of the action of F4/80+ interstitial macrophages and did not involve alveolar macrophages or their products. These observations demonstrate that clonal expansion of T cells in the lung compartment is prevented following the onset of either Th1- or Th2-mediated inflammation. This form of immune regulation, which appears as a selective defect in IL-2-driven proliferation, may serve to prevent the development of chronic pulmonary lymphoproliferative responses.

Administration, Inhalation

Th2-induced airway mucus production is dependent on IL-4Ralpha, but not on eosinophils.

Mucus hyperproduction in asthma results from airway inflammation and contributes to clinical symptoms, airway obstruction, and mortality. In human asthmatics and in animal models, excess mucus production correlates with airway eosinophilia. We previously described a system in which TCR transgenic CD4 Th2 cells generated in vitro were transferred into recipient mice and activated in the respiratory tract with inhaled Ag. Th2 cells stimulated airway eosinophilia and a marked increase in mucus production, while mice that received Th1 cells exhibited airway inflammation without eosinophilia or mucus. Mucus could be induced by IL-4-/- Th2 cells at comparable levels to mucus induced by IL-4+/+ Th2 cells. In the current studies we dissect further the mechanisms of Th2-induced mucus production. When IL-4-/- Th2 cells are transferred into IL-4Ralpha-/- mice, mucus is not induced, and BAL eosinophilia is absent. These data suggest that in the absence of IL-4, IL-13 may be critical for Th2-induced mucus production and eosinophilia. To determine whether eosinophils are important in mucus production, IL-5-/- Th2 cells were transferred into IL-5-/- recipients. Eosinophilia was abolished, yet mucus staining in the epithelium persisted. These studies show definitively that IL-5, eosinophils, or mast cells are not essential, but signaling through IL-4Ralpha is critically important in Th2 cell stimulation of mucus production.

Administration, Inhalation