Dopaminergic and opiate agonists and antagonists differentially decrease multiple schedule responding maintained by sucrose/ethanol and sucrose.

C J Slawecki; C W Hodge; H H Samson

doi:10.1016/s0741-8329(96)00153-x

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9160806

Dopaminergic and opiate agonists and antagonists differentially decrease multiple schedule responding maintained by sucrose/ethanol and sucrose.

C J Slawecki·C W Hodge·H H Samson

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Similar neurobiological mechanisms are hypothesized to influence ethanol- and food-related reinforcement processes. This study examined the ability of compounds with dopaminergic or opiate activity to selectively alter responding maintained by a sucrose/ethanol solution in comparison to a sucrose solution. Long-Evans rats were trained to press a lever using 5% sucrose/10% ethanol and 5% sucrose as the reinforcers on a multiple Fixed Ratio 4 Fixed Ratio 4 schedule of reinforcement. When stable responding was established, the effects of intraperitoneally administered amphetamine (0.0-3.0 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.0-1.0 mg/kg), morphine (0.0-10.0 mg/kg), and naloxone (0.0-10.0 mg/kg) were examined on total session reinforcer presentation and presentation of each reinforcer within individual multiple schedule components. Prior to drug treatment, the total number of reinforcer presentations of the sucrose/ethanol solution was significantly greater than sucrose reinforcer presentations, suggesting the sucrose/ethanol solution was a more efficacious reinforcer. All agents administered decreased responding maintained by sucrose/ethanol and sucrose. The dose-effect curves for sucrose/ethanol were shifted to the left compared to sucrose, suggesting that although the compounds did not selectively impact sucrose/ethanol-maintained responding, sucrose/ethanol-maintained responding was more sensitive to the effects of these compounds.

Explore related subjects

Amphetamine Animals Conditioning, Operant Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Ethanol Haloperidol Male Morphine Naloxone Nucleus Accumbens Rats Receptors, Dopamine Receptors, Opioid Reinforcement, Psychology Sucrose Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C J Slawecki, C W Hodge, H H Samson. Dopaminergic and opiate agonists and antagonists differentially decrease multiple schedule responding maintained by sucrose/ethanol and sucrose.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-8329(96)00153-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Food restriction enhances the central rewarding effect of abused drugs.

Chronic food restriction increases the systemic self-administration and locomotor-stimulating effect of abused drugs. However, it is not clear whether these behavioral changes reflect enhanced rewarding potency or a CNS-based modulatory process. The purpose of this study was to determine whether food restriction specifically increases the rewarding potency of drugs, as indexed by their threshold-lowering effect on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation, and whether any such effect can be attributed to an enhanced central response rather than changes in drug disposition. When drugs were administered systemically, food restriction potentiated the threshold-lowering effect of amphetamine (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), phencyclidine (1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg, i.p.), and dizocilpine (MK-801) (0.0125, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) but not nicotine (0.15, 0.3, 0.45 mg/kg, s.c.). When amphetamine (25.0, 50.0, and 100.0 microgram) and MK-801 (5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 microgram) were administered via the intracerebroventricular route, food restriction again potentiated the threshold-lowering effects and increased the locomotor-stimulating effects of both drugs. These results indicate that food restriction increases the sensitivity of neural substrates for rewarding and stimulant effects of drugs. In light of work that attributes rewarding effects of MK-801 to blockade of NMDA receptors on medium spiny neurons in nucleus accumbens, the elements affected by food restriction may lie downstream from the mesoaccumbens dopamine neurons whose terminals are the site of amphetamine-rewarding action. Possible metabolic-endocrine triggers of this effect are discussed, as is the likelihood that mechanisms mediating the modulatory effect of food restriction differ from those mediating sensitization by intermittent drug exposure.

Amphetamine↗

PubMed1998

Genetic analysis of behavioral, neuroendocrine, and biochemical parameters in inbred rodents: initial studies in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats and in A/J and C57BL/6J mice.

Previous work has identified inherent behavioral, neuroendocrine, and biochemical differences among inbred rodent strains that have been related to the animals' differential responsiveness to drugs of abuse or stress. In the present study, we sought to determine (1) whether there are genetic correlations among particular phenotypic traits that differ between a pair of inbred rat strains (Lewis and Fischer 344) or a pair of inbred mouse strains (A/J and C57BL/6J); (2) which of these traits might be amenable to quantitative trait locus analysis; and (3) whether additional behavioral or biochemical differences relevant to drug- or stress-responsiveness could be identified in these strains. Specifically, we measured several behavioral, neuroendocrine, and biochemical traits in parental Lewis and Fischer 344 rats and in 298 members of an F2 intercross population, as well as in parental A/J and C57BL/6J mice and in 11 of the AXB/BXA recombinant inbred mouse strains. Traits measured included exploratory locomotor activity in a novel environment; amphetamine-induced locomotor activity; several specific protein levels in striatal regions, including inhibitory G protein subunits, the dopamine transporter, the Fos family member transcription factor DeltaFosB, and the protein phosphatase inhibitor DARPP-32; and late-afternoon plasma corticosterone concentrations. Each of the traits measured in F2 rats or recombinant inbred mice appears to be influenced by multiple genes, as well as by environmental factors. There were statistically significant, albeit relatively weak, correlations among several traits in an F2 intercross population bred from Lewis and Fischer rats. Among the traits studied in Lewis and Fischer rats, one seemed most amenable to quantitative trait locus analysis: the level of the inhibitory G-protein subunit, Galphai, in the nucleus accumbens. We also found a robust genetic correlation between levels of DeltaFosB and levels of the dopamine transporter in striatal regions in AXB/BXA recombinant inbred mouse strains. While these studies demonstrate the likely complexity of the genetic factors that influence the numerous phenotypes associated with altered responsiveness to drugs of abuse and stress, they represent an initial and necessary step toward identifying specific genetic factors involved.

Amphetamine↗

PubMed1998

Vasopressin opposes locomotor stimulation by ethanol, cocaine and amphetamine in mice.

The effects of arginine8-vasopressin on the stimulation of locomotor activity induced by ethanol, cocaine and amphetamine were examined in DBA/2N mice. Locomotor activity was measured by photocell beam interruption for a period of 45 min following ethanol, cocaine or amphetamine administration. Pretreatment with vasopressin alone in a dose of 2 (but not 1) microg/mouse s.c. reduced locomotor activity. The low dose of vasopressin did not modify the stimulation of locomotor activity induced by i.p. administration of ethanol in doses of either 1.5 or 2 g/kg. The high dose of vasopressin reduced locomotor activity induced by both doses of ethanol, in an apparently additive manner. Cocaine in doses of 15 and 20 mg/kg strongly stimulated locomotor activity, but this stimulation was completely antagonized by pretreatment with 1 microg of vasopressin. Similarly, the stimulation of locomotor activity induced by amphetamine (5 mg/kg) was also blocked by pretreatment with vasopressin. These findings raise the possibility that the effect of vasopressin varies with the extent and nature of dopaminergic involvement in the drug-induced stimulation of activity. For drugs like cocaine or amphetamine which stimulate locomotor activity primarily through the mesolimbic dopaminergic system, vasopressin can completely antagonize the stimulation. For ethanol, which stimulates locomotor activity through action on a number of other neurotransmitters as well as dopamine, vasopressin treatment only reduces its stimulation of locomotor activity in an additive manner. These results suggest a close interaction between vasopressin and dopamine action.

Amphetamine↗