PubMed · 9155766
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J C Frölich. 1997. Euthanasia.. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689709000424
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
CONTEXT: Despite wide promulgation, clinical practice guidelines have had limited effect on changing physician behavior. Little is known about the process and factors involved in changing physician practices in response to guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To review barriers to physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), and HealthSTAR databases (January 1966 to January 1998); bibliographies; textbooks on health behavior or public health; and references supplied by experts to find English-language article titles that describe barriers to guideline adherence. STUDY SELECTION: Of 5658 articles initially identified, we selected 76 published studies describing at least 1 barrier to adherence to clinical practice guidelines, practice parameters, clinical policies, or national consensus statements. One investigator screened titles to identify candidate articles, then 2 investigators independently reviewed the texts to exclude articles that did not match the criteria. Differences were resolved by consensus with a third investigator. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators organized barriers to adherence into a framework according to their effect on physician knowledge, attitudes, or behavior. This organization was validated by 3 additional investigators. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 76 articles included 120 different surveys investigating 293 potential barriers to physician guideline adherence, including awareness (n = 46), familiarity(n = 31), agreement (n = 33), self-efficacy (n = 19), outcome expectancy (n = 8), ability to overcome the inertia of previous practice (n = 14), and absence of external barriers to perform recommendations (n = 34). The majority of surveys (70 [58%] of 120) examined only 1 type of barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on improving physician guideline adherence may not be generalizable, since barriers in one setting may not be present in another. Our review offers a differential diagnosis for why physicians do not follow practice guidelines, as well as a rational approach toward improving guideline adherence and a framework for future research.
INTRODUCTION: The intensive care physician is frequently confronted with the decision to withhold or withdraw therapy in patients with a poor prognosis. Apart from the legal implications, the practical management of withholding or withdrawing intensive care treatment continues to be indistinct. The subject has not been investigated in Austria or Germany. The aim of the study was to examine the different points of view of intensive care physicians and the various procedures to limit therapy in patients with a poor prognosis. METHODS: We interviewed physicians working at different intensive care departments of the University Hospital of Innsbruck from March to April 1998. RESULTS: Withholding treatment was given preference over withdrawing treatment. In regard of withdrawing treatment, 64% of the interviewed physicians felt more uncertain. In the decision making process the potential reversibility of disease was estimated to be more important than the wish of the patient. Hemofiltration and antibiotics were mentioned as the first measures the physicians would withdraw. The last measure that would be withheld was ventilatory support. Sixty-three per cent of the physicians felt that sedation and analgesia should be continued. In regard of withholding or withdrawing treatment 83% voted for an obligatory DNR order. CONCLUSION: Before withholding or withdrawing intensive care therapy, a medical specialist must determine and document the futile prognosis of the patient. If the patient's wish is unknown, all further decisions should be made in agreement with all participants. The goal of the therapy is to provide the patient maximum comfort under minimal intensive care treatment.