Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9154103

Soft tissue sarcomas.

Abstract

This synthesis of the literature on radiotherapy for sarcomas originating in the body's soft, supportive tissues, ie, muscle, connective tissue, and fatty tissue is based on 71 scientific articles, including 4 randomized studies, 5 prospective studies, and 26 retrospective studies. These studies involve 3,444 patients. Over 90% of patients with soft tissue sarcomas in the arms and legs can be treated in a way that preserves the extremities. Subcutaneous and intramuscular sarcomas can be treated surgically with little functional loss or risk for local recurrence without adjuvant radiotherapy. To avoid amputation, surgery is often combined with radiotherapy for treatment of local relapse. Adequate surgical margins are usually difficult to achieve for head/neck tumors and retroperitoneal tumors, and therefore surgery is often combined with radiotherapy to reduce the risk for local relapse. Pre- and postoperative radiotherapy are similar. A disadvantage of preoperative radiotherapy is that it reduces the opportunity for exact diagnosis and determining morphobiologic sarcoma parameters. To further improve treatment results for advanced sarcomas, it is necessary to introduce other fractionation schedules, mainly hyperfractionation. This places greater demands on radiotherapy, mainly for staff resources. Combining radiotherapy and local intraarterial chemotherapy involves greater risks for complications and has not shown better treatment results than pre- or postoperative radiotherapy alone, and it is not recommended as standard treatment for soft tissue sarcomas. Intraoperative treatment methods should be targeted for further study and development.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Alvegård. 1996. Soft tissue sarcomas.. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869609101671

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Two-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in human coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stenting have been demonstrated, but the outcome of patients treated with this novel technology beyond the first year remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the angiographic, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and clinical outcomes of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents 2 years after implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 30 patients treated with sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stenting (slow release [SR], n=15, and fast release [FR], n=15) in São Paulo, Brazil. Twenty-eight patients underwent 2-year angiographic and IVUS follow-up. No deaths occurred during the study period. In-stent late loss was slightly greater in the FR group (0.28+/-0.4 mm) than in the SR group (-0.09+/-0.23 mm, P=0.007). No patient had in-stent restenosis. At 2-year follow-up, only 1 patient (FR group) had a 52% diameter stenosis within the lesion segment, which required repeat revascularization. The target-vessel revascularization rate for the entire cohort was 10% (3/30) at 2 years. All other patients had < or =35% diameter stenosis. Angiographic lumen loss at the stent edges was also minimal (in-lesion late loss was 0.33+/-0.42 mm [FR] and 0.13+/-0.29 mm [SR]). In-stent neointimal hyperplasia volume, as detected by IVUS, remained minimal after 2 years (FR= 9.90+/-9 mm3 and SR=10.35+/-9.3 mm3). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stents 2 years after implantation in humans. In-stent lumen dimensions remained essentially unchanged at 2-year follow-up in the 2 groups, although angiographic lumen loss was slightly higher in the FR group. Restenosis "catch-up" was not found in our patient population.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported the safety and effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. The present investigation explored the potential of this technology to treat in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with in-stent restenosis were successfully treated with the implantation of 1 or 2 sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents in São Paulo, Brazil. Nine patients received 2 stents (1.4 stents per lesion). Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were obtained after the procedure and at 4 and 12 months. All vessels were patent at the time of 12-month angiography. Angiographic late loss averaged 0.07+/-0.2 mm in-stent and -0.05+/-0.3 mm in-lesion at 4 months, and 0.36+/-0.46 mm in-stent and 0.16+/-0.42 mm in-lesion after 12 months. No patient had in-stent or stent margin restenosis at 4 months, and only one patient developed in-stent restenosis at 1-year follow-up. Intimal hyperplasia by 3-dimensional IVUS was 0.92+/-1.9 mm(3) at 4 months and 2.55+/-4.9 mm(3) after 1 year. Percent volume obstruction was 0.81+/-1.7% and 1.76+/-3.4% at the 4- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. There was no evidence of stent malapposition either acutely or in the follow-up IVUS images, and there were no deaths, stent thromboses, or repeat revascularizations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the safety and the potential utility of sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Combined Modality Therapy↗