Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9146784

Acyclovir-induced colitis.

Abstract

Three patients developed acute colitis, either de novo, or as an exacerbation of pre-existing colitis, following the use of oral acyclovir, prescribed for Herpes zoster or Herpes simplex infection. Rechallenge with oral acyclovir was performed in one patient, and resulted in a recurrence of colitic symptoms. It is speculated that acyclovir can have a direct irritant effect on large bowel mucosa.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T D Wardle, J P Finnerty, V Swale, T Beer. 1997. Acyclovir-induced colitis.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.147323000.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for identifying resistant herpes simplex virus and measuring antiviral susceptibility.

BACKGROUND: A number of in vitro assays are used to determine susceptibility of HSV to antiviral agents, but results from these in vitro assays do not necessarily correlate with treatment outcome. OBJECTIVES: A method with improved capability for identifying an isolate as acyclovir (ACV) or penciclovir (PCV) resistant when resistance is borderline could greatly improve the management of HSV disease. STUDY DESIGN: A comparative evaluation of four in vitro assays, plaque reduction (PRA), DNA hybridization, plating efficiency (PEA) and plaque autoradiography (PAR) was performed to accurately identify and measure resistance of a TK-altered clinical HSV isolate (HSV-1 N4) from a patient who was non-responsive to ACV treatment. Two established criteria for the prediction of antiviral resistance, IC(50)> or =2.0 microg/ml or an IC(50) greater than 10x above a sensitive virus IC(50), as well as testing in human (MRC-5) and nonhuman (Vero and CV-1 monkey kidney) cell lines were evaluated. RESULTS: The PRA and DNA hybridization assays accurately identified HSV-1 N4 as ACV(r) in human cells when using the 10x above sensitive virus IC(50) resistance criterion. Moreover, the PEA and PAR assays failed to classify HSV-1 N4 as drug resistant and indicate that these technologies alone are inadequate for identifying resistant virus. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented herein indicate that the PRA and DNA hybridization assays most accurately identified an otherwise borderline-resistant isolate as drug resistant: (i) when a sensitive virus is used within each individual assay as a control, (ii) when ACV and PCV susceptibility is evaluated in human cells, and (iii) when the 10x above sensitive IC(50) criterion is used to classify a virus as drug-resistant. Testing of additional clinical samples is warranted to further confirm these findings.

Acyclovir↗

Fluorescent tricyclic analogues of acyclovir and ganciclovir. A structure-antiviral activity study.

Of a series of new guanine base modified tricyclic analogues of acyclovir (ACV, 1) and ganciclovir (GCV, 2), derivatives of the 3,9-dihydro-9-oxo-5H-imidazo[1,2-a]purine system, evaluated for activity against herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2, several fluorescent analogues, 6-(4-MeOPh)-TACV (8), 7-Me-6-Ph-TACV (17), 6-(4-MeOPh)-TGCV (27), and 7-Me-6-Ph-TGCV (28), were obtained that showed similar potency and selectivity as the parent compounds. The activity was found to be strongly dependent on the nature and steric demands of the substituents in the 6 and/or 7 position.

Acyclovir↗

Biochemical characterization of a virus isolate, recovered from a patient with herpes keratitis, that was clinically resistant to acyclovir.

In vitro susceptibility assays of herpes simplex virus (HSV) do not necessarily correlate with treatment outcome. An HSV type 1 (HSV-1) isolate, N4, recovered from a patient who presented with herpes keratitis with localized immunosuppression, was characterized for susceptibility. Although the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) for this isolate was less than the accepted breakpoint for defining resistance to acyclovir (>2.0 microg/mL), the following lines of evidence suggest that the isolate was acyclovir resistant: (1) the clinical history confirmed that the infection was nonresponsive to acyclovir; (2) the in vitro susceptibility was similar to that of a thymidine kinase (TK)-negative, acyclovir-resistant virus SLU360; (3) the IC(50) of acyclovir was more than 10 times the IC(50) for an acyclovir-susceptible control strain; (4) plaque-purified clonal isolates were resistant to acyclovir (IC(50)s, >2.0 microg/mL); and (5) biochemical studies indicated that the HSV-1 N4 TK was partially impaired for acyclovir phosphorylation. Although residue changes were found in both the viral tk and pol coding regions of HSV-1 N4, characterization of a recombinant virus expressing the HSV-1 N4 polymerase suggested that the TK and Pol together conferred the acyclovir-resistance phenotype.

Acyclovir↗