Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9136813

Serial and parallel processing in rhesus monkey auditory cortex.

J P Rauschecker·B Tian·T Pons·M Mishkin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Auditory cortex on the exposed supratemporal plane in four anesthetized rhesus monkeys was mapped electrophysiologically with both pure-tone (PT) and broad-band complex sounds. The mapping confirmed the existence of at least three tonotopic areas. Primary auditory cortex, AI, was then aspirated, and the remainder of the cortex on the supratemporal plane was remapped. PT-responses in the caudomedial area, CM, were abolished in all animals but one, in which they were restricted to the high-frequency range. Some CM sites were still responsive to complex stimuli. In contrast to the effects on CM, no significant changes were detectable in the rostral area, R. After mapping cortex in four additional monkeys, injections were made with different tracers into matched best-frequency regions of AI, R, and CM. Injections in AI and R led to retrograde labeling of neurons in all three subdivisions of the medial geniculate (MG) nucleus (MGv, MGd, and MGm), as well as nuclei outside MG, whereas CM injections led to only sparse labeling of neurons in a restricted zone of the lateral MGd and, possibly, MGm, in addition to labeling in non-MG sites. The combined results suggest that MGv sends direct projections in parallel to areas AI and R, which drive PT-responses in both areas. PT-responses in area CM, however, appear to be driven by input relayed serially from AI. The direct input to CM from MGd and other thalamic nuclei may thus be capable of mediating responses only to broad-band sounds.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAxonal TransportBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, AuditoryGeniculate BodiesMacaca mulattaNeuronsThalamusJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J P Rauschecker, B Tian, T Pons, M Mishkin. 1997-05-26. Serial and parallel processing in rhesus monkey auditory cortex.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9136813/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Temporal coding of concurrent acoustic signals in auditory midbrain.

A fundamental problem faced by the auditory system of humans and other vertebrates is the segregation of concurrent vocal signals. To discriminate between individual vocalizations, the auditory system must extract information about each signal from the single temporal waveform that results from the summation of the simultaneous acoustic signals. Here, we present the first report of midbrain coding of simultaneous acoustic signals in a vocal species, the plainfin midshipman fish, that routinely encounters concurrent vocalizations. During the breeding season, nesting males congregate and produce long-duration, multiharmonic mate calls that overlap, producing beat waveforms. Neurophysiological responses to two simultaneous tones near the fundamental frequencies of natural calls reveal that midbrain units temporally code the difference frequency (dF). Many neurons are tuned to a specific dF; their selectivity overlaps the range of dFs for naturally occurring acoustic beats. Beats and amplitude-modulated (AM) signals are also coded differently by most units. Although some neurons exhibit differential tuning for beat dFs and the modulation frequencies (modFs) of AM signals, others exhibit similar temporal selectivity but differ in their degree of synchronization to dFs and modFs. The extraction of dF information, together with other auditory cues, could enable the detection and segregation of concurrent vocalizations, whereas differential responses to beats and AM signals could permit discrimination of beats from other AM-like signals produced by midshipman. A central code of beat dFs may be a general vertebrate mechanism used for coding concurrent acoustic signals, including human vowels.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1997

Intracellular recordings in response to monaural and binaural stimulation of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat.

The inferior colliculus (IC) is a major auditory structure that integrates synaptic inputs from ascending, descending, and intrinsic sources. Intracellular recording in situ allows direct examination of synaptic inputs to the IC in response to acoustic stimulation. Using this technique and monaural or binaural stimulation, responses in the IC that reflect input from a lower center can be distinguished from responses that reflect synaptic integration within the IC. Our results indicate that many IC neurons receive synaptic inputs from multiple sources. Few, if any, IC neurons acted as simple relay cells. Responses often displayed complex interactions between excitatory and inhibitory sources, such that different synaptic mechanisms could underlie similar response patterns. Thus, it may be an oversimplification to classify the responses of IC neurons as simply excitatory or inhibitory, as is done in many studies. In addition, inhibition and intrinsic membrane properties appeared to play key roles in creating de novo temporal response patterns in the IC.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1997

Tonotopic organization of auditory cortical fields delineated by parvalbumin immunoreactivity in macaque monkeys.

Tonotopic maps, obtained from single and multi-unit recordings in the primary and surrounding areas of the auditory cortex, were related to chemoarchitecture of the supratemporal plane, as delineated by immunoreactivity for parvalbumin. Neurons in the central core were sharply tuned and formed two complete tonotopic representations corresponding to the primary auditory area (AI) and the rostral (R) area. High frequencies were represented posteriorly in AI and anteriorly in R, the representation reversing in the anterior part of the core. Neurons in regions of less dense immunostaining previously described as lateral (L) and posteromedial (P-m) fields, showed broader frequency tuning. Two tonotopic representations were found in L: in an anterolateral (AL) field, corresponding to a field previously reported by others, high frequencies were represented anteriorly and low frequencies posteriorly; in a posterolateral field (PL) the trend reversed. There was a further reversal on entering P-m from the high frequency representation in PL and progressively lower frequencies tended to be represented more medially in P-m, but P-m may contain two representations reported by others. Neurons in the previously described anteromedial (A-m) and medial (M) fields of weaker immunostaining, were even more broadly tuned. A tonotopic progression from low frequency representation posteriorly to high frequency representation anteriorly was observed in the medial field. Frequency representation in A-m remains uncertain. No tonotopic representation could be demonstrated with the stimuli used in the zones of very weak parvalbumin immunostaining outside AL, PL, P-m, A-m, and M. The properties of neurons in the core and surrounding zones are likely to reflect inputs from the ventral and dorsal medial geniculate nuclei, respectively. The fields outside the core seem to be the starting points for separate streams of auditory corticocortical connections passing into association cortex.

Acoustic Stimulation↗