PubMed · 9128694
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1997. Using appropriate resources.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9128694/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) are recognized examples of standardized nursing languages used to describe the contribution nursing makes to patient care. Columbus Regional Hospital nursing leadership recognized the need to use standardized nursing interventions and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes to describe the unique contribution nursing makes to patient education. In collaboration with the University of Iowa, NIC/NOC languages were implemented in the development of a patient education plan for a clinical pathway population.
BACKGROUND: An audit of the management and outcome of major trauma patients was carried out to determine ways in which the system of care may be improved. METHODS: The Major Trauma Management Study (MTMS) collected data prospectively on all consecutively admitted major trauma patients at eight major hospitals during a 12-month period. Outcome was studied using trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) and a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) analyses, as well as a preventable outcome analysis, which looked at survivors with complications or with a Glasgow Coma Score < 15 on discharge from hospital, as well as studying deaths. RESULTS: The group of 859 patients was more severely injured than most described previously, with a mortality of 14.8% and a mean injury severity score of 19.8. Formal ASCOT analysis indicated 2.25% fewer survivors than would be predicted by Major Trauma Outcome Study norms. Extrapolating the TRISS and ASCOT process to include those patients with missing data, and then comparing groups of matched severity with the norms, gave no statistically different outcome in the MTMS group of patients. Preventable outcome analysis revealed rates of preventable and potentially preventable (P/PP) outcomes of 32% among deaths and 8% among survivors. The types of management deficiencies responsible for P/PP outcomes are identified. CONCLUSIONS: The points of deficiency in a system of care have been identified, and the development of an integrated trauma system in Victoria, based upon these facts, is recommended. Children, the elderly, patients with head injuries and patients being transferred between hospitals would benefit from improvements to the system of care. The calculation of efficacy rate (0.95 for the MTMS patients) is recommended to accurately assess the system of care. Preventable Outcome Analysis is more relevant to auditing a system of trauma care in detail, than is ASCOT or TRISS. The MTMS has refined and defined the process so that it is reproducible in further comparative studies.
The critical pathway methodology of assigning and timing staff interventions and expected patient outcomes has developed worldwide recognition, but is less likely to be used in psychiatry than in other medical fields. At St. Mary's in Rochester, New York, an interdisciplinary team adapted the critical pathway concept to meet the needs of an acute inpatient population with relative success. Although staff education needs continue and plans to modify the pathway are in progress, all staff feel that the critical pathway is a viable tool for enhancing patient care and optimizing resources use. Benefits, obstacles, and suggestions are discussed.