Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9113518

Indications for mechanical ventilation.

Abstract

Indications for mechanical ventilation have evolved substantially since widespread use of ventilatory support began in the early 1960s. While the metabolic and blood-gas alterations that mandate institution of ventilatory support have remained unaltered, new noninvasive modes of ventilation have widened the therapeutic options available to patients in acute respiratory failure. An understanding of the effect of mechanical ventilation on other organ systems has clarified the role of mechanical ventilation in the treatment of conditions other than respiratory failure such as stroke or head injury. Studies in patients recovering from major surgery have better defined the benefits and risks of postoperative mechanical ventilation. Finally, a better understanding of disease processes has led to more prognostic information that can help physicians, patients, and families decide on limits to compassionate care. The proper use of mechanical ventilation in disease states that do not involve respiratory failure as their primary manifestation is also important in light of the risks of respiratory support. In patients with CNS injury, the role of hyperventilation is limited to acute control of dangerous elevations of intracranial pressure. Although hypocarbia has been proposed to improve regional cerebral blood flow, studies have not demonstrated an improvement in outcome, suggesting that the risks of intubation, tracheal stimulation, sedation, and inability to examine the mental status outweigh any benefit. Some evidence suggests a detrimental effect from prolonged hyperventilation. The use of mechanical ventilation in postoperative care is another area that requires scrutiny. Numerous studies have shown that with coordination of care between surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses, many patients can be extubated significantly sooner than in the past. As techniques for administering anesthesia, performing surgery, and managing pain and mild respiratory insufficiency improve, knowledge in this area will continue to develop. Finally, the relation between mechanical ventilation, quality of life, and patient autonomy has come to play a greater role as the population ages. In many situations, respiratory failure represents the end stage of an irreversible disease. Whereas respiratory failure secondary to pulmonary contusion in young patients does not indicate a poor outcome, progressive respiratory failure in cystic fibrosis or following bone marrow transplantation usually represents a preterminal event. Understanding the epidemiology of respiratory failure in different disease categories is important to physicians, patients, and families in making informed decisions about their care. Mechanical ventilation represents a vital, fundamental form of life support. As the diseases, tools, and treatments change in anesthesia and critical care, careful definition of the role of mechanical ventilation in specific diseases, the route by which it is delivered, and the ability of such a form of life support to affect outcome will continue to be necessary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Tung. 1997. Indications for mechanical ventilation.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004311-199703510-00003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine administration during isoflurane anaesthesia in Shetland ponies.

BACKGROUND: The arterial pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine enantiomers after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine i.v. administration were evaluated in seven gelding ponies in a crossover study (2-month interval). METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with isoflurane in oxygen via a face-mask and then maintained at each pony's individual MAC. Racemic ketamine (2.2 mg kg(-1)) or S-ketamine (1.1 mg kg(-1)) was injected in the right jugular vein. Blood samples were collected from the right carotid artery before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 min after ketamine administration. Ketamine and norketamine enantiomer plasma concentrations were determined by capillary electrophoresis. Individual R-ketamine and S-ketamine concentration vs time curves were analysed by non-linear least square regression two-compartment model analysis using PCNonlin. Plasma disposition curves for R-norketamine and S-norketamine were described by estimating AUC, C(max), and T(max). Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (R(f)), tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume ventilation (V(E)), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PE'(CO(2))), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of S- and R-ketamine administered in the racemic mixture or S-ketamine administered separately did not differ significantly. Statistically significant higher AUC and C(max) were found for S-norketamine compared with R-norketamine in the racemic group. Overall, R(f), V(E), PE'(CO(2)), and MAP were significantly higher in the racemic group, whereas PR was higher in the S-ketamine group. CONCLUSIONS: Norketamine enantiomers showed different pharmacokinetic profiles after single i.v. administration of racemic ketamine in ponies anaesthetised with isoflurane in oxygen (1 MAC). Cardiopulmonary variables require further investigation.

Anesthesia, General↗