Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9097361

Felbamate.

Abstract

The development and release of felbamate is characterized by several relatively unique features. Felbamate was submitted to innovative and unconventional clinical trials. It was the first antiepileptic drug (AED) to be tested in a double-blind fashion in patients withdrawn from AEDs for presurgical video/electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring. In addition, felbamate was the first AED to be tested in double-blind monotherapy trials. Felbamate was also the first drug to be tested in a placebo-controlled trial in children with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. When it was first released in North America in 1993, felbamate was the first new antiepileptic drug in 15 years. Finally, after 1 year of being very successfully marked as a drug devoid of the adverse effects of other AEDs, felbamate came very close to being completely withdrawn from the market, because of several cases of fatal bone marrow aplesia and liver toxicity. At the present time, the main indication for felbamate is in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and similar forms of epilepsy, who failed to respond to other AEDs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B F Bourgeois. 1997. Felbamate.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-9091(97)80003-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗