PubMed · 9063158
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A D Viazis. 1995. Bioefficient therapy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9063158/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY DESIGN: Stresses in vertebral endplates and discs were calculated using the three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element model of a lumbar spine with an internal spinal fixation device. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of fixator stiffness on stresses in the adjacent discs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are few computer models of the lumbar spine with a fixator. Most of these models neglect the muscle forces. Fixator stiffness is assumed to influence greatly the stresses in the adjacent discs. METHODS: Two three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element models were used to determine stresses in the lumbar spine for standing and 60 degrees flexion of the upper body. One model had an internal spinal fixator, the other did not. In a parameter study, the diameters of the longitudinal rod of the fixator were assumed to be 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm. In the computer model, the forces of the trunk muscles were simulated. RESULTS: The diameter of the longitudinal rod strongly affected the fixator loads but hardly influenced the stresses in the vertebral endplates. The stresses in the bridged discs were strongly reduced. However, the internal fixator had only a minor influence on the stresses in the anulus fibrosus and the pressure in the nucleus pulposus of the adjacent discs. CONCLUSIONS: The stiffness of an internal spinal fixation device has only a minor influence on stresses in the adjacent discs.
Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) is an analytical technique in which an oscillating stress is applied to a sample and the resultant strain measured as functions of both oscillatory frequency and temperature. From this, a comprehensive knowledge of the relationships between the various viscoelastic parameters, e.g. storage and loss moduli, mechanical damping parameter (tan delta), dynamic viscosity, and temperature may be obtained. An introduction to the theory of DMA and pharmaceutical and biomedical examples of the use of this technique are presented in this concise review. In particular, examples are described in which DMA has been employed to quantify the storage and loss moduli of polymers, polymer damping properties, glass transition temperature(s), rate and extent of curing of polymer systems, polymer-polymer compatibility and identification of sol-gel transitions. Furthermore, future applications of the technique for the optimisation of the formulation of pharmaceutical and biomedical systems are discussed.