Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9040808

Lasers: reflections on their evolution.

Abstract

A review of the past 22 years of laser applications shows that a great deal of progress has been made. It allows one to see the evolution of laser therapy, compare it with other modalities used in surgical oncology, and identify certain program that merit clinical trial. Use of lasers in surgical oncology began with a laser knife. Tissues were divided and removed with the focused beam of the CO2 laser, which replaced the scalpel previously used to perform surgical procedures. Later, the Nd:YAG laser was used in hollow visci such as the trachea and esophagus to open obstructed passages and possibly to cure many cancers. The operating microscope was used in the larynx to remove benign and malignant lesions, and for obstructing lesions to provide time to treat medical complications by reopening airway passages, and to add irradiation and/or chemotherapy preoperatively. Many times the Nd:YAG laser was used gastroscopically to treat bleeding or obstruction. Cytoreduction by laser made surgery or chemotherapy, or both, plausible. Addition of the sapphire tip and, later, the bare of sculptured fiber increased the variety of procedures possible with the Nd:YAG laser. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses various drugs that are localized in cancer cells. The cancer is then destroyed by laser emissions of the proper wavelength. One of the problems with PDT is getting the light to the tumor. Preactivation is addressed in this report. The problems associated with anaerobic tumors are discussed and suggestions for clinical trials offered. Laser hyperthermia is compared with induced hyperthermia as well as in combination with irradiation. Protocols of local laser hyperthermia combined with irradiation need further exploration. This review addresses the use of lasers in the destruction of tumor cells for bone marrow transplant and several old and new experiments used to block the AIDS virus. Finally, ongoing research is discussed, including the present and future roles of lasers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B L Aronoff. 1997. Lasers: reflections on their evolution.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199701)64%3A1%3C84%3A%3Aaid-jso17%3E3.0.co%3B2-w

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multimodality image registration quality assurance for conformal three-dimensional treatment planning.

PURPOSE: We present a quality assurance methodology to determine the accuracy of multimodality image registration and fusion for the purpose of conformal three-dimensional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. Registration and fusion accuracy between any combination of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and positron emission computed tomography (PET) imaging studies can be evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A commercial anthropomorphic head phantom filled with water and containing CT, MR, and PET visible targets was modified to evaluate the accuracy of multimodality image registration and fusion software. For MR and PET imaging, the water inside the phantom was doped with CuNO(3) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), respectively. Targets consisting of plastic spheres and pins were distributed throughout the cranium section of the phantom. Each target sphere had a conical-shaped bore with its apex at the center of the sphere. The pins had a conical extension or indentation at the free end. The contours of the spheres, sphere centers, and pin tips were used as anatomic landmark models for image registration, which was performed using affine coordinate-transformation tools provided in a commercial multimodality image registration/fusion software package. Four sets of phantom image studies were obtained: primary CT, secondary CT with different phantom immobilization, MR, and PET study. A novel CT, MR, and PET external fiducial marking system was also tested. RESULTS: The registration of CT/CT, CT/MR, and CT/PET images allowed correlation of anatomic landmarks to within 2 mm, verifying the accuracy of the registration software and spatial fidelity of the four multimodality image sets. CONCLUSIONS: This straightforward phantom-based quality assurance of the image registration and fusion process can be used in a routine clinical setting or for providing a working image set for development of the image registration and fusion process and new software.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗

A double exposed portal image comparison between electronic portal imaging hard copies and port films in radiation therapy treatment setup confirmation to determine its clinical application in a radiotherapy center.

PURPOSE: At the William Buckland Radiotherapy Center (WBRC), field-only electronic portal image (EPI) hard copies are used for radiation treatment field verification for whole brain, breast, chest, spine, and large pelvic fields, as determined by a previous study. A subsequent research project, addressing the quality of double exposed EPI hard copies for sites where field only EPI was not considered adequate to determine field placement, has been undertaken. The double exposed EPI hard copies were compared to conventional double exposed port films for small pelvic, partial brain, and head and neck fields and for a miscellaneous group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All double exposed EPIs were captured during routine clinical procedures using liquid ion chamber cassettes. EPI hard copies were generated using a Visiplex multi-format camera. In sites where port film remained the preferred verification format, the port films were generated as per department protocol. In addition EPIs were collected specifically for this project. Four radiation oncologists performed the evaluation of EPI and port film images independently with a questionnaire completed at each stage of the evaluation process to assess the following: Adequacy of information in the image to assess field placement. Adequacy of information for determining field placement correction. Clinician's preferred choice of imaging for field placement assessment RESULTS: The results indicate that double exposed EPI hard copies generally do containsufficient information to permit evaluation of field placement and can replace conventionaldouble exposed port films in a significant number of sites. These include the following:pelvis fields < 12 X 12 cm, partial brain fields, and a miscellaneous group. However forradical head and neck fields, the preferred verification image format remained port film dueto the image hard copy size and improved contrast for this media. Thus in this departmenthard copy EPI is the preferred modality of field verification for all sites except radical headand neck treatments. This should result in an increase in efficiency of workloadmanagement and patient care.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗