Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 9019366

Overview and future prospects.

Abstract

At present, resection affords highly selected patients with limited liver cancer their only choice for cure. Palliation with currently available agents and techniques often is not successful, but recent advances promise a brighter future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Foster. 1996. Overview and future prospects.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9019366/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Prinomastat, a hydroxamate inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases, has a complex effect on migration of breast carcinoma cells.

Membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) and alphavbeta3 integrin have been directly implicated in tumor cell dissemination and metastasis. We have demonstrated that in the case of breast carcinoma MCF7 cells co-expressing MT1-MMP and alphavbeta3 integrin, the proteinase processes the pro-alphav integrin subunit, thus facilitating alphavbeta3 integrin maturation and cell migration on vitronectin. Our findings show that cell surface MT1-MMP is a short-lived protein with a life span in the range of several hours. In contrast, turnover of alphavbeta3 integrin is much slower. The half-life of alphavbeta3 heterodimer is about 24 hr. This large difference in life span allowed us to distinguish between the effects of MT1-MMP on cell migration brought by matrix proteolysis from those imposed through alphavbeta3 integrin maturation. We then modulated the enzyme's activity by a potent hydroxamate MMP inhibitor, Prinomastat (AG3340), to analyze the divergent effects of MT1-MMP on cell migration. Although Prinomastat immediately blocked MT1-MMP-mediated matrix degradation, the pool of MT1-MMP-modified alphavbeta3 integrin molecules was still capable of mediating cell-matrix interactions. To our considerable surprise, inhibition of MT1-MMP-dependent vitronectin proteolysis by Prinomastat allowed a several-fold increase in migration of MCF7 cells co-expressing MT1-MMP and alphavbeta3 integrin. In contrast, long-term Prinomastat inhibition of MT1-MMP-dependent pro-alphav cleavage and thus alphavbeta3 integrin maturation strongly inhibited cell motility. Our studies suggest that MT1-MMP could actually promote cell migration via modification of the cell surface receptors, including alphavbeta3 integrin, rather than facilitate cell migration through direct cleavage of the matrix proteins.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Killing tumours by ceramide-induced apoptosis: a critique of available drugs.

Over 1000 research papers have described the production of programmed cell death (apoptosis) by interventions that elevate the cell content of ceramide (Cer). Other interventions, which lower cellular Cer, have been found to interfere with apoptosis induced by other agents. Some studies have shown that slowing the formation of proliferation-stimulating sphingolipids also induces apoptosis. These relationships are due to the two different aspects of Cer: Cer itself produces apoptosis, but metabolic conversion of Cer into either sphingosine 1-phosphate or glucosphingolipids leads to cell proliferation. The balance between these two aspects is missing in cancer cells, and yet intervention by stimulating or blocking only one or two of the pathways in Cer metabolism is very likely to fail. This results from two properties of cancer cells: their high mutation rate and the preferential survival of the most malignant cells. Tumours treated with only one or two drugs that elevate Cer can adjust the uncontrolled processes to either maintain or to 'aggravate' the excessive growth, angiogenesis and metastasis characteristics of tumours. These treatments might simply elevate the production of growth factors, receptors and other substances that reduce the effectiveness of Cer. Tumour cells that do not adapt in this way undergo apoptosis, leaving the adapted cells free to grow and, ultimately, to 'subdue' their host. Thus it is important to kill every type of cancer cell present in the tumour rapidly and simultaneously, using as many different agents to control as many pathways as possible. To aid this approach, this article catalogues many of the drugs that act on different aspects of Cer metabolism. The techniques described here may lead to the development of practical chemotherapy for cancer and other diseases of excess proliferation.

Antineoplastic Agents↗