Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8992276

Continuing medical education.

Abstract

While continuing medical education (CME) is receiving increasing attention from medical educators and health administrators worldwide, many efforts need to be made to improve its performance and overall effectiveness. Traditionally, CME has depended primarily on periodic courses and conferences. These remain of unproven cost-effectiveness and often the choice of their content is not tailored to meet best the needs of the learners. It is proposed that CME activities be reshaped to depend more on supervised small-group tutorials in which the learner is an active participant in preparation and presentation. Moreover, instead of having CME activities take place once or twice a year in a distant location, a more practical format would be to plan additional activities more frequently, but less condensed, on an ongoing basis and preferably at the place of work all year round. Factors that may increase learner motivation would be to depend not only on attendance at CME activities but also on the introduction of assessment mechanisms that will measure objectively the actual desired advancement of the learners. Incentives for good learners and teachers need to be introduced. The cost of CME is heavy and can be a burden on health authorities and medical institutions. Contributions from the medical/pharmaceutical industry are acceptable provided quality control is assured and conflict of interest is avoided. Increasing use of computer-assisted teaching and modern telecommunication should, in the near future, help to reduce costs and improve effectiveness of most CME programmes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I S Salti. 1995. Continuing medical education.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02904.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Costs of surgeries in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is essential for achieving global health equity, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face major gaps in access and planning, partly due to limited evidence on the costs and resource requirements of surgical interventions. Understanding these costs is vital for designing efficient and equitable health systems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, EconLit and grey literature) to identify studies reporting the costs of surgeries in LMICs from January 2000 to June 2023. Minor and major surgical procedures were considered, focusing on therapeutic procedures (excluding diagnostic interventions). Studies that clearly identified, quantified and costed hospital resources and services deployed in the provision of surgical care, and included at least two of the surgical production factors (ie, consumables, diagnostics, personnel, infrastructure and overhead) in the costing were included. Costs were standardised to 2023 International dollars (I$) for comparability. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies from 29 countries met the inclusion criteria, with 210 cost estimates across 65 procedure groups. Costs varied widely: from I$1.54 for a caesarean section in Tanzania to I$618 098 for paediatric cataract surgery in Zambia. Full costing studies reported higher estimates than partial costing studies. Most studies (60%) originated from upper-middle-income countries, with limited data (10%) from low-income settings. CONCLUSION: This review provides a reference list of surgical procedure costs across LMICs, highlighting considerable cost variation by procedure, specialty and country. The findings underscore the need for better-quality, standardised cost data-especially from low-income countries-to inform national surgical plans, universal health coverage benefit packages and reimbursement policies.

Developing Countries↗