PubMed · 8984465
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Wyndham. 1996. Shingles.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8984465/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In the face of an exponential increase in published biomedical studies, dermatologists frequently turn to review articles in order to keep abreast of important developments in the treatment of skin diseases. Traditional review articles have recently been criticized on the basis of their incompleteness and susceptibility to bias. Such biases can be minimized by employing a systematic approach to gathering, combining and interpreting the evidence of treatment efficacy. Using eight predetermined quality criteria, we compared the quality of 10 traditional review with one systematic review of treatments for postherpetic neuralgia, which were identified from the Medline database for 1992-96. None of the 10 traditional review articles satisfied all eight criteria: one satisfied five, two satisfied four and the rest satisfied two or fewer criteria. There was a wide variation in the recommendations of the authors for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia, often based on anecdotal evidence and clinical experience. On the other hand, the systematic review fulfilled seven of the eight quality criteria, failing only to discuss future directives. Furthermore, treatment recommendations were made solely on the basis of randomized controlled trials, which are considered to be the gold standard for measuring the benefits of any intervention. The variation in quality and treatment recommendations of traditional reviews is worrying. Systematic reviews should be encouraged in dermatology because they provide a summary of evidence of the effects of dermatological treatments, which has been derived using explicit methods widely accepted within science.
A man with a 15-year history of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma presented with disseminated herpes zoster which initially responded to aciclovir. This was shortly followed by an acute exacerbation in the sites previously affected which was apparently resistant to antiviral therapy. Biopsy revealed a dense monomorphic lymphocytic infiltrate below active herpes zoster which had the same morphology and immunoreactivity as the underlying lymphoma. His clinical condition resolved with further chemotherapy for his lymphoma and continued treatment with aciclovir.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.