Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8960448

Angina and left ventricular dysfunction.

Abstract

Angina with left ventricular dysfunction exhibits a wide range of different presentations. Approximately 45% of patients referred for coronary artery bypass surgery have some degree of left ventricular dysfunction and, given that at least a third of those suffering from angina have a history of myocardial infarction, the prevalence of left ventricular dysfunction in such patients is likely to be substantial. The major prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease is the degree of left ventricular function and it is important to identify those with poor or reduced left ventricular function. High-risk patients, defined by exercise testing and echocardiography, should be considered for revascularization. For the majority of patients management should be medical, consisting of nitrates plus a beta-blocker or calcium antagonist. In severe ischaemia, the combination of these agents has been shown to provide additional efficacy. In patients with heart failure the newer calcium antagonist amlodipine has been shown to have a neutral effect upon survival, indicating that it may be used safely in patients with angina and left ventricular dysfunction. Progression of left ventricular dysfunction may be slowed through the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which have also been shown to improve survival, although they should be used with caution, since there is evidence that ACE inhibitors may worsen angina in some patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H J Dargie. 1996. Angina and left ventricular dysfunction.. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj%2F17.suppl_g.2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

CD14 C(-260)-->T polymorphism, plasma levels of the soluble endotoxin receptor CD14, their association with chronic infections and risk of stable coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the association of CD14 genotype and plasma levels of soluble (s)CD14 with risk of stable coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic infections and sensitive markers of systemic inflammation. BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that genetic variation of the CD14 receptor with increased CD14 gene expression might play a role in atherogenesis. A mechanistic link would consist in its contribution to the inflammatory response seen in this disease. METHODS: We measured levels of sCD14 (microg/ml; ELISA) in 312 patients with angiographically proven CAD and stable angina pectoris, and in 477 age- and gender-matched healthy blood donors. CD14 genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction. In addition, seropositivity to Chlamydia pneumoniae and Helicobacter pylori, a complete lipid profile and various sensitive systemic markers of inflammation were measured. RESULTS: CD14 C(-260)-->T genotype was not independently associated with increased risk of CAD after multivariable adjustments (odds ratio [OR] 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 2.16). However, sCD14 plasma levels were higher in subjects with TT genotype compared with those with CT or CC genotype (p = 0.005). Plasma levels were not different between cases and controls (4.2 +/- 1.3 microg/ml vs. 4.3 +/- 1.3 microg/ml, p = NS). In multivariable logistic regression, the OR for the presence of CAD was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.91) if the top quintile of the sCD14 distribution was compared with the bottom quintile. There was no consistent association between seropositivity to either C. pneumoniae or H. pylori, or both, and sCD14 levels and between sCD14 levels or CD14 genotype and the various markers of inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not confirm an independent relationship between CD14 genotypes or plasma levels of sCD14 and risk of stable CAD in this population.

Angina Pectoris↗

Interleukin-18 is a strong predictor of cardiovascular death in stable and unstable angina.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)-18 plays a central role in orchestrating the cytokine cascade and accelerates atherosclerosis and plaque vulnerability in animal models. However, epidemiological data evaluating the role of IL-18 levels in atherosclerosis are lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective study of 1229 patients with documented coronary artery disease, we measured baseline serum concentrations of IL-18 and other markers of inflammation. During the follow-up period (median, 3.9 years), 95 patients died of cardiovascular causes. Median serum concentrations of IL-18 were significantly higher among patients who had a fatal cardiovascular event than among those who did not (68.4 versus 58.7 pg/mL; P<0.0001). The hazard risk ratio of future cardiovascular death increased with increasing quartiles of IL-18 (hazard risk ratio, 1.46; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.76; P for trend <0.0001). After adjustment for most potential confounders, including the strong predictor ejection fraction as well as the inflammatory variables IL-6, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen, this relation remained almost unchanged, such that patients within the highest quartile of IL-18 had a 3.3-fold increase in hazard risk compared with those in the first quartile (95% CI, 1.3 to 8.4, P=0.01). This relation was observed in patients with stable angina and patients with unstable angina at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IL-18 level was identified as a strong independent predictor of death from cardiovascular causes in patients with coronary artery disease regardless of the clinical status at admission. This result strongly supports recent experimental evidence of IL-18-mediated inflammation leading to acceleration and vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques.

Angina Pectoris↗