Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8947891

Quality functions for requirements engineering in system development methods.

M Johansson·T Timpka
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Based on a grounded theory framework, this paper analyses the quality characteristics for methods to be used for requirements engineering in the development of medical decision support systems (MDSS). The results from a Quality Function Deployment (QFD) used to rank functions connected to user value and a focus group study were presented to a validation focus group. The focus group studies take advantage of a group process to collect data for further analyses. The results describe factors considered by the participants as important in the development of methods for requirements engineering in health care. Based on the findings, the content which, according to the user a MDSS method should support is established.

Explore related subjects

Decision Making, Computer-AssistedDocumentationInformation SystemsQuality ControlJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Johansson, T Timpka. Quality functions for requirements engineering in system development methods.. https://doi.org/10.3109/14639239608995015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness of computer support for determining optimum drug dose. DESIGN: Systematic review of comparative studies where computers gave advice to clinicians on the most appropriate drug dose. Search methods used were standard for the Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice. SUBJECTS: Comparative studies conducted worldwide and published between 1966 and 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For qualitative review, relative percentage differences were calculated to compare effects of computer support in different settings. For quantitative data, effect sizes were calculated and combined in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The drugs studied were theophylline, warfarin, heparin, aminoglycosides, nitroprusside, lignocaine, oxytocin, fentanyl, and midazolam. The computer programs used individualised pharmacokinetic models to calculate the most appropriate dose. Meta-analysis of data from 671 patients showed higher blood concentrations of drug with computer support (effect size 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.02) and reduced time to achieve therapeutic control (0.44, 0.17 to 0.71). The total dose of drug used was unchanged, and there were fewer unwanted effects of treatment. Five of six studies measuring outcomes of care showed benefit from computer assistance. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that using computers to determine the correct dose of certain drugs in acute hospital settings is beneficial. Computers may give doctors the confidence to use higher doses when necessary, adjusting the drug dose more accurately to individual patients. Further research is necessary to evaluate the benefits in general use.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗
PubMed1999

[Do computerized reminders to the patients affect the preventive work in general practice?].

Norwegian general practitioners have the opportunity to perform preventive medicine on many levels. There are uncertainties as to the effect of this activity. A systematic approach is one of the prerequisites for obtaining significant results. We have made a study of the review literature concerning computerised patient-specific reminders used in preventive health care. Electronic literature search was supplemented by expert-guided manual search. We found that a conclusion from the literature is that such computerised reminders have a lasting effect regarding doctors' handling of preventive care issues. The effect of reminders in a general practice setting will be determined by the way they are implemented. In this process it will be necessary to address motivating issues, technical solutions and administrative adjustments.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗
PubMed1999

Formal description of temporal knowledge in case reports.

Patient case analysis is an elementary and crucial process which clinicians are daily confronted with. The importance and complexity is reflected in the need to discuss cases in clinicopathological conferences and the documentation of more than 70,000 patient cases in MEDLINE. This paper introduces a generic patient case report language (PCRL) based on general medical temporal concepts to formalise temporal knowledge as present in case descriptions. The lack of such a generic technique is reflected by the fact that computers are very restrictive in accepting patient specific temporal information. Acceptance is almost always controlled and guided by specific predefined disease or treatment models. We strive for a case library consisting of unambiguous patient case descriptions formulated independent from future use.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗