Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 894001

A procedure for dissociating Ayre scrape samples.

Abstract

The dissociation of cervical cell suspensions after various chemical and enzymatic treatments was monitored by using the Centrifugal Cytology rotor to produce glutaraldehyde-fixed dispersions on conventional microscope slides and subsequent Pap staining. A special program was written in RPG II to record and analyze the results of the dissociation experiments in terms of white blood cells and the true cervical cells ("other cells"), and the degree of dissociation and recovery of both classes of cells. Since accurate differential counts on the untreated Ayre scrapes were difficult, the samples were syringed gently to break up the large or adventitious clumps. Cumulated results from control preparations indicate that the white blood cells and "other cells" are composed respectively of 92 and 63% single cells. The cells were further dissociated by: dissolving the cervical mucin sequentially with dithiothreitol and iodoacetic acid; depolymerizing the nucleohistone gel with ribonuclease; solubilizing the desmosomes with EDTA; removing the remaining cellular agglutinins with Varidase; and finally mechanical dispersion by hypertonic shock. The optimum procedure for dissociation involves the use of ribonuclease, dithiothreitol, iodoacetic acid EDTA, Varidase and sucrose shock. The white blood cells are now monodisperse and 81% of the "other cells" are found as single cells. If nuclear separation by two diameters is considered sufficient 98% of the "other cells" are single. The slide preparations are now sufficiently good that a scanning system is feasible.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R C Leif, S Nordqvist, S Clay, M Cayer, D Ingram, B F Cameron, D Bobbitt, R Gaddis, S B Leif, A Cabanas. 1977. A procedure for dissociating Ayre scrape samples.. https://doi.org/10.1177/25.7.894001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Use of the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer for rapid and reproducible molecular typing of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis is an economic and fast technique for molecular typing but has the drawback of difficulties in accurately sizing DNA fragments and comparing banding patterns on agarose gels. We aimed to improve RFLP for typing of the important human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae and to compare the results with the commonly used typing techniques of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing. We designed primers to amplify a noncoding region adjacent to the pneumolysin gene. The PCR product was digested separately with six restriction endonucleases, and the DNA fragments were analyzed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer for accurate sizing. The combined RFLP results for all enzymes allowed us to assign each of the 47 clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae tested to one of 33 RFLP types. RFLP analyzed using the bioanalyzer allowed discrimination between strains similar to that obtained by the more commonly used techniques of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, which discriminated between 34 types, and multilocus sequence typing, which discriminated between 35 types, but more quickly and with less expense. RFLP of a noncoding region using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer could be a useful addition to the molecular typing techniques in current use for S. pneumoniae, especially as a first screen of a local population.

Autoanalysis↗

A three-armed trial of the ThinPrep Imaging System.

We compared the performance of the ThinPrep (TP) Imaging System (TIS) with manual reading of TP slides (TPM) and with manual reading of the paired conventional Pap smear (PS) in terms of sensitivity for and positive predictive value (PPV) of high-grade disease and productivity. The study consisted of 11,416 routine PS and paired TP slides as well as 103 confirmed abnormal TP slides. In terms of sensitivity for the detection of biopsy-confirmed high-grade disease, overall there was no statistically significant difference between TIS-screened TP (TPI) and TPM (81.1% vs. 86.8%). For the routine cases, TPI was significantly more sensitive than PS (73.4% vs. 57.8%). In terms of PPVs for the cytologic prediction of high-grade disease, there was no statistically, significant difference among TPI, TPM, and PS (75.6%, 73.9%, and 84.6%). For cytologic reports of possible high-grade disease, the PPVs were equivalent for TPI (45.0%) and TPM (37.0%) and there was no significant difference in PPVs between TPI and PS (61.3%). For TP slides, TIS screening showed a 27% productivity gain when compared with manual screening and a 54% productivity gain when compared with manual screening of PS slides. Use of TIS showed productivity benefits when compared with TPM and both productivity and sensitivity benefits over use of PS.

Autoanalysis↗