[Rectal prolapse].

S Medina González

PubMed · 8927915

[Rectal prolapse].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques have been developed in order to treat rectal procidentia, an uncommon pathology that is managed occasionally by the general surgeon. PURPOSE: This review article was performed in order to discuss the most recent changes in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of rectal procidentia. RESULTS: The pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of rectal procidentia are discussed. There are numerous alternatives for surgical treatment, but the most employed techniques include rectopexy with or without sigmoid resection. CONCLUSION: The better understanding of the physiopathology, the increasingly accurate evaluation of the anorectal function and its disorders, and the development of new biocompatible materials and finer techniques offer the patient the treatment that better suits to his or her particular problem.

Explore related subjects

Colon, Sigmoid Diagnosis, Differential Female Humans Laparoscopy Male Rectal Prolapse Rectum English Abstract Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

S Medina González. [Rectal prolapse].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8927915/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Acute morbidity reduction using 3DCRT for prostate carcinoma: a randomized study.

PURPOSE: To study the effects on gastrointestinal and urological acute morbidity, a randomized toxicity study, comparing conventional and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for prostate carcinoma was performed. To reveal possible volume effects, related to the observed toxicity, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were used. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From June 1994 to March 1996, 266 patients with prostate carcinoma, stage T1-4N0M0 were enrolled in the study. All patients were treated to a dose of 66 Gy (ICRU), using the same planning procedure, treatment technique, linear accelerator, and portal imaging procedure. However, patients in the conventional treatment arm were treated with rectangular, open fields, whereas conformal radiotherapy was performed with conformally shaped fields using a multileaf collimator. All treatment plans were made with a 3D planning system. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined to be the gross target volume (GTV) + 15 mm. Acute toxicity was evaluated using the EORTC/RTOG morbidity scoring system. RESULTS: Patient and tumor characteristics were equally distributed between both study groups. The maximum toxicity was 57% grade 1 and 26% grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity; 47% grade 1, 17% grade 2, and 2% grade > 2 urological toxicity. Comparing both study arms, a reduction in gastrointestinal toxicity was observed (32% and 19% grade 2 toxicity for conformal and conventional radiotherapy, respectively; p = 0.02). Further analysis revealed a marked reduction in medication for anal symptoms: this accounts for a large part of the statistical difference in gastrointestinal toxicity (18% vs. 14% [p = ns] grade 2 rectum/sigmoid toxicity and 16% vs. 8% [p < 0.0001] grade 2 anal toxicity for conventional and conformal radiotherapy, respectively). A strong correlation between exposure of the anus and anal toxicity was found, which explained the difference in anal toxicity between both study arms. No difference in urological toxicity between both treatment arms was found, despite a relatively large difference in bladder DVHs. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in gastrointestinal morbidity was mainly accounted for by reduced toxicity for anal symptoms using 3DCRT. The study did not show a statistically significant reduction in acute rectum/sigmoid and bladder toxicity.

Colon, Sigmoid↗

PubMed1999

Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results.

UNLABELLED: Optional treatment for complete rectal prolapse remains controversial. PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience over a 19-year period to assess trends in choice of operation, recurrence rates, and functional results. METHODS: We identified 372 patients who underwent surgery for complete rectal prolapse between 1976 and 1994. Charts were reviewed and follow-up (median, 64: range, 12-231 months) was obtained by mailed questionnaire (149 patients; 40 percent) and telephone interview (35 patients; 9 percent). Functional results were obtained from 184 responders (49 percent). RESULTS: Median age of patients was 64 (11-100) years, and females outnumbered males by nine to one. One-hundred and eighty-eight patients (51 percent) were lost to follow-up; 183 patients (49 percent) underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy, and 161 patients (43 percent) underwent abdominal rectopexy with bowel resection. The percentage of patients who underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy increased from 22 percent in the first five years of the study to 79 percent in the most recent five years. Patients undergoing perineal rectosigmoidectomy were more likely to have associated medical problems as compared with patients undergoing abdominal rectopexy (61 vs. 30 percent, P = 0.00001). There was no significant difference in morbidity, with 14 percent for perineal rectosigmoidectomy vs. 20 percent for abdominal rectopexy. Abdominal procedures were associated with a longer length of stay as compared with perineal rectosigmoidectomy (8 vs. 5 days, P = 0.001). Perineal procedures, however, had a higher recurrence rate (16 vs. 5 percent, P = 0.002). Functional improvement was not significantly different, and most patients were satisfied with treatment and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that abdominal rectopexy with bowel resection is associated with low recurrence rates. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy provides lower morbidity and shorter length of stay, but recurrence rates are much higher. Despite this, perineal rectosigmoidectomy has appeal as a lesser procedure for elderly patients or those patients in the high surgical risk category. For younger patients, the benefits of perineal rectosigmoidectomy being a lesser procedure must be weighed against a higher recurrence rate.Patient satisfaction]

Colon, Sigmoid↗

PubMed1999

A laparoscopic pull-through operation for Hirschsprung's disease: report of two infant cases.

We describe herein a primary laparoscopic pull-through procedure that was successfully employed to treat two infants with Hirschsprung's disease. Mobilization of the rectum and sigmoid colon was performed laparoscopically, and the rectal mucosa was removed via a transanal submucosal resection. After inducing the rectal prolapse intussusceptically, the rectum was circumferentially transected, and the mobilized colon was pulled down through the rectal muscle cuff. Resection of the aganglionic bowel and the coloanal anastomosis, using the Soave-Denda method, was performed outside the anus. Both infants had an uneventful postoperative course with early recovery of bowel movement. Our experience demonstrates that this minimally invasive surgical procedure is feasible for young infants, and we believe that Hirschsprung's disease may be a definite indication for laparoscopic surgery.

Colon, Sigmoid↗