Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8924006

Emergency laparoscopic procedures.

Abstract

Emergency laparoscopic procedures (ELPs) have been performed since the 1960s. It never caught on due to limitations inherent in the actual procedure. Technological innovations notably in camera, electronic insufflators and light systems were key to the rebirth of laparoscopy in the late 1980s. This was mostly confined to elective indications where its benefits were most obvious. With increasing experience, the benefits of minimally access surgery (MAS) are being applied to emergency indications such as evaluation of peritonitis and abdominal pain, appendectomy, repair of perforated ulcers and other acute conditions. ELP offers good training for surgeons but requires a trained laparoscopist to perform more complicated procedures. As there is not much time for thorough patient evaluation, patient selection and resuscitation are key to safe ELP. It should be done the same way as in open surgery; the difference is in the access. Visibility and technical difficulties are more likely and where further progress is limited or patient's condition changes, then early conversion is wise. Conversion rate in ELP is higher and the tolerance level for this should be much lower than in elective circumstances. However, the benefits of ELPs can be seen in decreased wound and other complications, and earlier mobilisation. Hospitalisation is not very much shorter in most instances as managing the disease process itself requires this. With time, more emergency procedures will be done laparoscopically for demand and knowledge will increase as patients and surgeons become familiar with MAS.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Ravintharan. 1996. Emergency laparoscopic procedures.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8924006/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dehydration related abdominal pain (DRAP).

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of dehydration as a medical cause of acute abdomen. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analytical study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: The study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital, Malir Cantonment Karachi between March 1, 2000 to March 1, 2002. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All the patients reporting with abdominal pain to the surgical outpatient department or the emergency department, were reviewed in the study. The clinical findings in all these cases were studied along with the mode of their management and outcome. RESULTS: Of all the patients presenting with abdominal pain, 303% (n=68) were suffering from dehydration related abdominal pain. They were predominantly males in a ratio of 8.7:1, mostly in the 2nd and 3rd decades of their lives. All these cases were suffering from acute or chronic dehydration were provisionally diagnosed by general practitioners as 'acute abdomen' and referred for surgical consultation. Associated symptoms included vomiting in 42.6% backache in 91.2%, headache in 95.6%, and pain in lower limbs in 97.1% of the cases. 83.8% required indoor management with intravenous fluids. All the patients became asymptomatic with rehydration therapy. CONCLUSION: Dehydration is a possible cause of severe abdominal pain. There is a need to educate the general public about the benefits of adequate fluid intake.

Abdomen, Acute↗

Management of intussusception.

Intussusception represents the most common abdominal emergency in infancy. The classical clinical triad, consisting of abdominal colics, red jelly stools and a palpable mass, is only present in approximately 50% of cases, 20% of patients are symptom free at clinical presentation. Primary imaging modality of choice is ultrasound scanning, which enables the diagnosis or exclusion of an intussusception at a sensitivity of 98-100%, specificity of 88% and a negative predictive value of 100%. In emergency cases, additional plain films are necessary to detect potential intestinal perforation, to identify intestinal obstruction or other diseases mimicking the clinical presentation. Once the diagnosis of an intussusception is established, non-surgical reduction (NSR) is used. A surgical approach is chosen in patients with signs of perforation, shock or peritonitis. Depending on the choice of guiding imaging technique, different contrast media are used for NSR. Barium suspension or air with fluoroscopic guidance, or saline only or mixed with water-soluble contrast under sonographic guidance, has to be used. Regardless of the used contrast medium, NSR is an effective technique, being successfully employed in more than 90% of cases.

Abdomen, Acute↗

Imaging strategies in children with suspected appendicitis.

Appendicitis is the commonest acute surgical emergency of childhood, and occurs in approximately 2-4 per 1000 infants. It is usually seen in infants older than 5 years but can occur at any age. Atypical clinical findings are seen in 30-50% of children, especially the younger ones, and often leads to a delayed diagnosis. Preoperative clinical assessment alone has yielded an accuracy ranging between 70 and 90% but is associated with a normal appendectomy rate of 13-25%. Preoperative imaging using the graded compression US technique and/or different helical CT techniques has been able to reduce this rate to 3-7% without an increase in perforation rate. An extensive review of the literature revealed several papers examining the accuracy of different imaging modalities and strategies of acute appendicitis in children. The reported sensitivity of US varied between 87 and 95%, vs 95-97% for helical CT, while the specificity ranged between 85 and 98% for US and 94 and 97% for helical CT. Only one truly randomised study was found, showing that compared with US alone, a combination of US and helical CT increased the sensitivity from 86 to 99%, while the specificity decreased from 95 to 89%. We conclude that imaging should be performed in all children with suspected appendicitis and that US should be the initial procedure with CT as a complementary tool.

Abdomen, Acute↗