Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8923551

Spatial interactions in perceived speed.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the perception of motion within a local region is influenced by other motions within neighboring areas (eg induced motion). Here, a study is reported of the perceived speed of dots moving within a circular target region, which was surrounded by other motions within a larger surrounding area. The perceived speed of the central dots was found to be fastest when the surround was stationary; it became slower as the speed of motion in the surround was increased. This decrease in the perceived target speed with increases in surround velocity occurred regardless of whether the direction in which the surround moved was the same as or opposite to the motion of the target region. This result cannot be explained by using simple models of perceived speed that depend only upon such factors as the magnitude of relative motion between center and surround. The spatial area over which these motion interactions occur was also investigated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H P Norman, J F Norman, J T Todd, D T Lindsey. 1996. Spatial interactions in perceived speed.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p250815

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Comparing the small sample performance of several variance estimators under competing risks.

We examine several variance estimators for cumulative incidence estimators that have been proposed over time, some of which are derived from asymptotic martingale or counting process theory, and some of which are developed from the moments of the multinomial distribution. There is little published work comparing these variance estimators, largely because the variance estimators are algebraically complex and difficult to interpret and all but one have yet to be programmed for a standard statistical package. Through simulation and application to real data, we compare the performance of six variance estimators in relation to each other and the bootstrap in order to confirm earlier reports of their performance and to provide future direction toward their application. We find that the multinomial-moment-based estimators have performance close to that of the bootstrap, and are quite accurate for estimating the variance, even in samples of 20 subjects. All but one of the martingale theory-based estimators tend to perform poorly in small samples, tending to either overestimate or underestimate the empirical variance in samples of fewer than 100 subjects.

Analysis of Variance↗