Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8914873

Current-based transthoracic defibrillation.

Abstract

This study examines in a prospective, multicenter trial the feasibility and advantage of current-based, transthoracic defibrillation. Current-based, damped, sinusoidal waveform shocks of 18, 25, 30, 35, or 40 amperes (A) were administered beginning with 25 A for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) or 18 A for monomorphic VT; success rates were compared with those of energy-based shocks beginning at 200 J for VF/polymorphic VT and 100 J for VT. The current-based shocks were delivered from custom-modified defibrillators that determined impedance in advance of any shock using a "test-pulse" technique; the capacitor then charged to the exact energy necessary to deliver the operator-selected current against the impedance determined by the defibrillator. Three hundred sixty-two patients received > 1 shock for VF, polymorphic VT, or monomorphic VT: 569 current- based shocks and 420 energy-based shocks. Current-based shocks of 35/40 A achieved success rates of up to 74% for VF/polymorphic VT; 30 A shocks terminated 88% of monomorphic VT episodes. Energy-based shocks of 300 J terminated 72% of VF/polymorphic VT; 200-J shocks terminated 89% of monomorphic VT. We could not demonstrate a significant increase in the success rate of current-based shocks over energy-based shocks for patients with high transthoracic impedance; this may be due to inadequate sample size. Thus, current-based defibrillation is clinically feasible and effective. A larger study will be needed to test whether current-based defibrillation is superior to energy-based defibrillation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R E Kerber, R A Kieso, M G Kienzle, B Olshansky, A L Waldo, M D Carlson, D J Wilber, A M Aschoff, S Birger, F Charbonnier. 1996-11-15. Current-based transthoracic defibrillation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)90062-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Is the orientation of the apical defibrillation paddle of importance during manual external defibrillation?

OBJECTIVE: Transthoracic impedance (TTI) is a factor determining the magnitude of the transmyocardial current during external defibrillation. Minimising TTI increases the chances of successful defibrillation. Most external defibrillation paddles are rectangular in shape and can, therefore, be placed in a transverse or longitudinal orientation. The apical paddle is often placed in a transverse orientation. This may theoretically result in a higher TTI than a longitudinal orientation because of poorer contact at the lateral paddle edges. We compared TTI with the apical paddle in both a transverse and longitudinal orientation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty sequential anaesthetised patients were studied. A pair of defibrillator paddles were instrumented to measure paddle force. TTI was recorded pre-operatively at end-expiration with the apical paddle in both longitudinal and transverse orientations. The sternal paddle was placed in a longitudinal orientation for all measurements. RESULTS: TTI decreased in both transverse and longitudinal orientations as paddle force increased. Transverse paddle orientation resulted in a significantly (P<0.01) higher TTI than longitudinal orientation at all paddle forces below 12 kg force. CONCLUSION: The longitudinal orientation of a rectangular defibrillation paddle provides a lower TTI than orientation horizontally.

Electric Countershock↗