Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8887377

Basic occupational epidemiologic measures.

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the "response" side of the exposure-response relationship and summarizes some of the measures of effect that are commonly used in occupational epidemiologic research. The author covers some basic statistical standardization procedures that are used to help compare these measures among groups that differ with respect to age or other factors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G M Marsh. Basic occupational epidemiologic measures.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8887377/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pulmonary hypertension after splenectomy?

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of asplenia has been observed in patients with unexplained pulmonary hypertension. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of patients with postsplenectomy pulmonary hypertension and to compare the prevalence of surgical asplenia in patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension and patients with other pulmonary diseases. DESIGN: Case series and case-control study. SETTING: University hospital in Hannover, Germany. PATIENTS: 61 patients with pulmonary hypertension and 151 lung transplant recipients. RESULTS: The prevalence of asplenia in patients with pulmonary hypertension was 11.5% (95% CI, 4.7% to 22.2%) compared with 0% (CI, 0% to 3.2%) in those without pulmonary hypertension (P < 0.001). Histopathologic examination of lung specimens from patients with postsplenectomy pulmonary hypertension showed intimal fibrosis, plexiform lesions, and abundant thrombotic lesions. CONCLUSION: Patients who have had splenectomy may be at increased risk for developing pulmonary hypertension.

Case-Control Studies

The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a major disease and treatment burden for cancer patients. Several scales have been created to measure fatigue, but many are long and difficult for very ill patients to complete, or they are not easy to translate for non-English speaking patients. The Brief Fatigue Inventory was developed for the rapid assessment of fatigue severity for use in both clinical screening and clinical trials. METHODS: The study enrolled 305 consecutive, consenting adult inpatients and outpatients with cancer who could understand and complete the self-report measures used in the study. The same instruments also were administered to 290 community-dwelling adults to obtain a comparison sample. Research staff completed a form that indicated the primary site and stage of the cancer, rated the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of the patient, described the characteristics of the pain, and described the current pain treatment being provided to the patients. RESULTS: The BFI was shown to be an internally stable (reliable) measure that tapped a single dimension, best interpreted as severity of fatigue. It correlated highly with similar fatigue measures. Greater than 98% of patients were able to complete it. A range of scores defining severe fatigue was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The BFI is a reliable instrument that allows for the rapid assessment of fatigue level in cancer patients and identifies those patients with severe fatigue.

Case-Control Studies