Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8886902

Fatigue: a concept analysis.

E Ream·A Richardson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Fatigue is probably the most common symptom of illness affecting sufferers of both acute and chronic conditions. However, confusion surrounds the definition and use of the term fatigue. As with many other nursing concepts, it is a word that is commonly used in colloquial language. This concept analysis aims to identify the attributes that are essential to the concept of fatigue, and to distinguish between its colloquial and its nursing usage by following the strategy suggested by Walker and Avant (1995, Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing, Appleton Lange, London). A review of the literature identifies nursing uses of the term fatigue which reflect and conflict with colloquial uses. Defining attributes, demonstration cases, antecedents, consequences and empirical referents are identified before a definition of fatigue is developed and proposed for nursing. This clarification of the phenomenon has particular relevance for clinical nursing, future research and the development of fatigue theories.

Explore related subjects

Chronic DiseaseErgonomicsFatigueHumansNursing TheorySemanticsTerminology as TopicJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Ream, A Richardson. 1996. Fatigue: a concept analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7489(96)00004-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2004

Contribution of Mendelian disorders to common chronic disease: opportunities for recognition, intervention, and prevention.

Recognizing Mendelian disorders should improve health care for persons with strong familial risks for common chronic diseases. The Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database was reviewed to identify Mendelian disorders featuring 17 common chronic diseases, including 9 cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, and 7 common cancers. Mendelian disorders were selected if any one of the 17 diseases was reported in more than two families manifesting in adulthood. Patterns of chronic diseases and modes of inheritance associated with these Mendelian disorders are described. The GeneTests/Reviews database and other websites were reviewed to determine availability of genetic testing and management and prevention recommendations for the selected disorders. Of 2,592 (OMIM) entries reviewed, 188 Mendelian disorders were selected. Most (67.7%) are autosomal dominant disorders. Almost half (45.8%) feature combinations of the chronic diseases under study. At least one gene is known for 68.8% of the selected disorders, and clinical genetic testing is available for 55% of disorders. Guidelines for management and prevention are available for 33.9% of these, ranging from recommendations for supportive care to guidelines for managing affected persons and screening relatives. Significant clinical heterogeneity exists for Mendelian disorders that might present as strong family histories of common chronic diseases. Recognition of the different combinations of diseases within a pedigree, including mode of inheritance and heritable disease risk factors, facilitates diagnosis of these Mendelian disorders. Genetic testing is available for most disorders, which can further clarify the genetic risk, and for some, recommendations for management and prevention are available. However, evidence-based guidelines are needed.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2004

Why people smoke.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗