Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8886637

Endoscopy databases: the Norwegian experience.

L Aabakken
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The implementation of endoscopy databases in Norway has been slow, and no commercial system has been successfully introduced. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To determine the current status in this area a questionnaire survey was conducted with replies received from 58 of the 67 hospitals to which the questionnaire was sent. RESULTS: Only 40% of the units had one or more personal computers available, but video endoscopes will soon be standard equipment at most Norwegian hospitals. For managing administrative data, a large majority of endoscopy units used a general-purpose hospital information system, but endoscopy data are dealt with manually in 72% of the units. The endoscopy report itself was produced manually in 93% of the units. When asked to rank various features of database systems according to their relative importance, the endoscopists stated that ease of use and simplification of routine chores were the most important aspects, while advanced storage and research features were less crucial. CONCLUSION: In Norwegian hospitals, the use of minimal endoscopic database systems that offer a high level of integration with existing hospital systems appears to be the most promising approach.

Explore related subjects

Database Management SystemsEndoscopy, Digestive SystemHospital Information SystemsHumansNorwayJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Aabakken. 1996. Endoscopy databases: the Norwegian experience.. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1005530

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

PageMan: an interactive ontology tool to generate, display, and annotate overview graphs for profiling experiments.

BACKGROUND: Microarray technology has become a widely accepted and standardized tool in biology. The first microarray data analysis programs were developed to support pair-wise comparison. However, as microarray experiments have become more routine, large scale experiments have become more common, which investigate multiple time points or sets of mutants or transgenics. To extract biological information from such high-throughput expression data, it is necessary to develop efficient analytical platforms, which combine manually curated gene ontologies with efficient visualization and navigation tools. Currently, most tools focus on a few limited biological aspects, rather than offering a holistic, integrated analysis. RESULTS: Here we introduce PageMan, a multiplatform, user-friendly, and stand-alone software tool that annotates, investigates, and condenses high-throughput microarray data in the context of functional ontologies. It includes a GUI tool to transform different ontologies into a suitable format, enabling the user to compare and choose between different ontologies. It is equipped with several statistical modules for data analysis, including over-representation analysis and Wilcoxon statistical testing. Results are exported in a graphical format for direct use, or for further editing in graphics programs.PageMan provides a fast overview of single treatments, allows genome-level responses to be compared across several microarray experiments covering, for example, stress responses at multiple time points. This aids in searching for trait-specific changes in pathways using mutants or transgenics, analyzing development time-courses, and comparison between species. In a case study, we analyze the results of publicly available microarrays of multiple cold stress experiments using PageMan, and compare the results to a previously published meta-analysis.PageMan offers a complete user's guide, a web-based over-representation analysis as well as a tutorial, and is freely available at http://mapman.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/pageman/. CONCLUSION: PageMan allows multiple microarray experiments to be efficiently condensed into a single page graphical display. The flexible interface allows data to be quickly and easily visualized, facilitating comparisons within experiments and to published experiments, thus enabling researchers to gain a rapid overview of the biological responses in the experiments.

Database Management Systems↗
PubMed2006

TaxMan: a taxonomic database manager.

BACKGROUND: Phylogenetic analysis of large, multiple-gene datasets, assembled from public sequence databases, is rapidly becoming a popular way to approach difficult phylogenetic problems. Supermatrices (concatenated multiple sequence alignments of multiple genes) can yield more phylogenetic signal than individual genes. However, manually assembling such datasets for a large taxonomic group is time-consuming and error-prone. Additionally, sequence curation, alignment and assessment of the results of phylogenetic analysis are made particularly difficult by the potential for a given gene in a given species to be unrepresented, or to be represented by multiple or partial sequences. We have developed a software package, TaxMan, that largely automates the processes of sequence acquisition, consensus building, alignment and taxon selection to facilitate this type of phylogenetic study. RESULTS: TaxMan uses freely available tools to allow rapid assembly, storage and analysis of large, aligned DNA and protein sequence datasets for user-defined sets of species and genes. The user provides GenBank format files and a list of gene names and synonyms for the loci to analyse. Sequences are extracted from the GenBank files on the basis of annotation and sequence similarity. Consensus sequences are built automatically. Alignment is carried out (where possible, at the protein level) and aligned sequences are stored in a database. TaxMan can automatically determine the best subset of taxa to examine phylogeny at a given taxonomic level. By using the stored aligned sequences, large concatenated multiple sequence alignments can be generated rapidly for a subset and output in analysis-ready file formats. Trees resulting from phylogenetic analysis can be stored and compared with a reference taxonomy. CONCLUSION: TaxMan allows rapid automated assembly of a multigene datasets of aligned sequences for large taxonomic groups. By extracting sequences on the basis of both annotation and BLAST similarity, it ensures that all available sequence data can be brought to bear on a phylogenetic problem, but remains fast enough to cope with many thousands of records. By automatically assisting in the selection of the best subset of taxa to address a particular phylogenetic problem, TaxMan greatly speeds up the process of generating multiple sequence alignments for phylogenetic analysis. Our results indicate that an automated phylogenetic workbench can be a useful tool when correctly guided by user knowledge.

Database Management Systems↗