Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8881306

[Developmental dysphasia].

Abstract

Developmental dysphasia is characterized by severe, specific and unexplained developmental language impairment. Phonologic and syntactic disorders of expressive language and perceptual deficit are almost always present. Moreover, certain specific linguistic symptoms are particular to each dysphasic child, explaining the efforts to classify different forms of dysphasia. The most important point is to separate receptive dysphasia from the expressive on the one hand, and severe forms from the mild which are closed to "simple language delay", on the other. The evolution of oral language is variable, but often long and difficult, with persistent linguistic deficit. Reading and writing acquisition is usually difficult, although very important for the socio-professional outcome and language improvement. The etiology remains unknown and is probably multifactorial. One pathogenic hypothesis is based on the absence of the usual hemisphere specialisation related to various prenatal or postnatal events. A genetic basis seems likely for certain dysphasic children. Development of knowledge about this condition and improvement of both speech therapy and teaching are essential for the outcome of these otherwise intelligent and normal children.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Billard, C Duvelleroy-Hommet, B de Becque, P Gillet. 1996. [Developmental dysphasia].. https://doi.org/10.1016/0929-693x(96)83232-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Auditory temporal-order judgement is impaired in patients with cortical lesions in posterior regions of the left hemisphere.

Auditory temporal-order judgement was investigated in patients suffering from unilateral focal brain lesions, localized in anterior or posterior regions of the left hemisphere (LH) (resulting in non-fluent or fluent aphasia, respectively), or in predominantly subcortical regions of this hemisphere (without aphasic syndromes) and in anterior or posterior regions of the right hemisphere. The temporal order threshold was measured as the minimum time interval between two clicks presented consecutively and binaurally via headphones (one to each ear) that was necessary for a subject to indicate the temporal order of the two stimuli. Only the patient group with fluent aphasia showed a significantly increased mean temporal-order threshold as compared to the controls. Our results indicate that fine temporal resolution for auditory stimuli is predominantly associated with posterior regions of the LH.

Aphasia

Subcortical mechanisms in language: lexical-semantic mechanisms and the thalamus.

Four previously published cases of dominant thalamic lesion in which the author has participated are reviewed to gain a better understanding of thalamic participation in lexical-semantic functions. Naming deficits in two cases support Nadeau and Crosson's (1997) hypothesis of a selective engagement mechanism involving the frontal lobes, inferior thalamic peduncle, nucleus reticularis, and other thalamic nuclei, possibly the centromedian nucleus. This mechanism selectively engages those cortical areas required to perform a cognitive task, while maintaining other areas in a state of relative disengagement. Deficits in selective engagement disproportionately affect lexical retrieval based on semantic input, as opposed to lexical and sublexical processes, because the former is more dependent upon this attentional system. The concept of selective engagement is also useful in understanding thalamic participation in working memory, as supported by data from one recent functional neuroimaging study. Other processes also may be compromised in more posterior thalamic lesions which damage the pulvinar but not other components of this selective engagement system. A third case with aphasia after a more superior and posterior thalamic lesion also had oral reading errors similar to those in neglect dyslexia. The pattern of deficits suggested a visual processing problem in the early stages of reading. The fourth case had a category-specific naming deficit after posterior thalamic lesion. Taken together, the latter two cases indicate that the nature of language functions in more posterior regions of the dominant thalamus depends upon the cortical connectivity of the thalamic region. Together, findings from the four cases suggest that thalamic nuclei and systems are involved in multiple processes which directly or indirectly support cortical language functions.

Aphasia