Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8865637

Across-channel processes in frequency modulation detection.

Abstract

This study investigated how well listeners combine information about frequency changes imposed on different carrier frequencies. The pattern of frequency change over time was either identical or different across carriers; this is referred to as "coherence." Psychometric functions were measured for the detection of frequency modulation (FM) imposed on two sinusoidal carriers, with frequencies 1100 and 2000 Hz. The modulation of each carrier was equally detectable, as determined in preliminary experiments. A continuous pink noise background was used to mask the outputs of auditory filters tuned between the two carrier frequencies. In experiment 1, the carriers were gated synchronously with l-s steady state duration and 50-ms raised-cosine ramps. One cycle of 5-Hz sinusoidal FM was used, the carrier having unmodulated "fringes" on either side of this. The FM on the two carriers was symmetrically located about the temporal center of the stimulus. The relative timing of the onset of FM (lag) between the two carriers was systematically varied. When the FM overlapped partially or completely in time across carriers, detectability for coherent FM was often better than for incoherent FM, especially for lag = 0, and was also often better than predicted on the assumption that information about the FM on the two carriers was extracted independently and combined optimally. When the FM did not overlap in time across the carriers, the detectability of the combined FM was generally equal to or lower than the value predicted on this assumption. In experiment 2, the long steady-state fringes before and after the modulation were removed, and the modulation always started at the same time for the two carriers. The modulation rate was either 2.5, 5, or 10 Hz. Again, performance for coherent FM was generally better than for incoherent FM. The effect of FM coherence was greater at the lowest modulation rate but did not vary markedly with the number of modulation cycles. The detectability of coherent FM was well above the value predicted on the assumption that information from the two carrier frequencies was processed independently and combined optimally. These results indicate the auditory system has higher sensitivity to FM when the FM is coherent across carriers. Possible models to account for the results are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Furukawa, B C Moore. 1996. Across-channel processes in frequency modulation detection.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.417939

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Observing a speaker's mouth profoundly influences speech perception. For example, listeners perceive an "illusory" "ta" when the video of a face producing /ka/ is dubbed onto an audio /pa/. Here, we show how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate this illusory percept and audiovisual (AV) speech perception more generally. Specifically, cortical activity during AV speech perception occurs in many of the same areas that are active during speech production. We find that different perceptions of the same syllable and the perception of different syllables are associated with different distributions of activity in frontal motor areas involved in speech production. Activity patterns in these frontal motor areas resulting from the illusory "ta" percept are more similar to the activity patterns evoked by AV(/ta/) than they are to patterns evoked by AV(/pa/) or AV(/ka/). In contrast to the activity in frontal motor areas, stimulus-evoked activity for the illusory "ta" in auditory and somatosensory areas and visual areas initially resembles activity evoked by AV(/pa/) and AV(/ka/), respectively. Ultimately, though, activity in these regions comes to resemble activity evoked by AV(/ta/). Together, these results suggest that AV speech elicits in the listener a motor plan for the production of the phoneme that the speaker might have been attempting to produce, and that feedback in the form of efference copy from the motor system ultimately influences the phonetic interpretation.

Auditory Perception↗

Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: a PET study.

While persistence of subtle phonological deficits in dyslexic adults is well documented, deficit of categorical perception of phonemes has received little attention so far. We studied learning of phoneme categorization during an activation H(2)O(15) PET experiment in 14 dyslexic adults and 16 normal readers with similar age, handedness and performance IQ. Dyslexic subjects exhibited typical, marked impairments in reading and phoneme awareness tasks. During the PET experiment, subjects performed a discrimination task involving sine wave analogues of speech first presented as pairs of electronic sounds and, after debriefing, as syllables /ba/ and /da/. Discrimination performance and brain activation were compared between the acoustic mode and the speech mode of the task which involved physically identical stimuli; signal changes in the speech mode relative to the acoustic mode revealed the neural counterparts of phonological top-down processes that are engaged after debriefing. Although dyslexic subjects showed good abilities to learn discriminating speech sounds, their performance remained lower than those of normal readers on the discrimination task over the whole experiment. Activation observed in the speech mode in normal readers showed a strongly left-lateralized pattern involving the superior temporal, inferior parietal and inferior lateral frontal cortex. Frontal and parietal subparts of these left-sided regions were significantly more activated in the control group than in the dyslexic group. Activations in the right frontal cortex were larger in the dyslexic group than in the control group for both speech and acoustic modes relative to rest. Dyslexic subjects showed an unexpected large deactivation in the medial occipital cortex for the acoustic mode that may reflect increased effortful attention to auditory stimuli.

Auditory Perception↗