Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8847124

Rapid application development in small unit settings.

Abstract

Small units with specialised functions often have difficulty in developing information systems because of their unique and dynamic requirements, the smallness of their applications relative to the large inter-organisational networks, and the sheer numbers of such units, especially in government. Personal experience with the difficulty of establishing a suitable information system has led to the development of a methodology for endusers to develop their own applications with only the guidance of information technology professionals (ITPs)--here entitled 'Small Unit Enduser Rapid Application Development' or SERAD. A data base management system (DBMS) is used to manage data about 'focal objects' with status flags and queries/views at interface points through UDA (UserAction, DataEntry, ApplicationAction) cycles. The system which permits data entry almost immediately, not only eventually creates a full application, but also trains endusers in the process. The methodology leads ITPs and ensuers through a sequence of exercises in systems analysis, tailored to minimise the time and effort input of ITPs despite the relative lack of IT training and concepts in endusers, with a view to rapidly creating dynamic, robust and sound information systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Yap. 1995. Rapid application development in small unit settings.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7101(95)01140-a

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

E-mailing your doctor.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Computer Communication Networks

Responses to unsolicited patient e-mail requests for medical advice on the World Wide Web.

CONTEXT: The Internet is increasingly used by consumers to seek health and medical information, but online medical advice has not been explored systematically. OBJECTIVE: To explore the attitude of physicians and other providers of medical information on the Internet toward unsolicited e-mail from patients and their reaction to a fictitious acute medical problem described in such an e-mail. DESIGN: E-mail in December 1997 and January 1998 to Web sites from a fictitious patient describing an acute dermatological problem. Follow-up questionnaire survey to the same sites. SETTING: World Wide Web. SUBJECTS: Fifty-eight physicians and Web masters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rate and types of responses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (50%) responded to the fictitious patient request; 9 respondents (31%) refused to give advice without having seen the lesion, 27 (93%) recommended that the patient see a physician, and 17 (59%) explicitly mentioned the correct "diagnosis" in their reply. In response to the questionnaire, 8 (28%) of the 29 respondents said that they tended not to answer any patient e-mail, 7 (24%) said they usually reply with a standard e-mail message, and 7 (24%) said they answer each request individually. CONCLUSIONS: Responses of physicians and Web masters to e-mail requests for medical advice vary as do approaches to handling unsolicited e-mail. Standards for physician response to unsolicited patient e-mail are needed.

Computer Communication Networks