Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8838163

Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.

Abstract

Can shape differences drive apparent motion? Results from previous research are equivocal. Much of the confusion may be due to the use of relatively complex stimuli: letters or geometric shapes, comprising many spatial frequencies, phases, orientations, and contrasts. We focus on relatively simple stimuli: Gaussian damped f+nf compound sinewave gratings. We examine whether relative phase differences, which are critical for shape perception, can drive apparent motion. We find that some, but not all, phase differences can drive apparent motion. Specifically, stimuli that are easily discriminable and perceptually dissimilar can affect the solution of the correspondence problem. In this case, observers consistently perceive stimuli in one frame moving to the position of perceptually similar stimuli in the next frame. This general result holds over a wide range of spatial frequencies, orientations, and contrasts. Implications for theories of motion processing are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A B Sekuler, P J Bennett. 1996. Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211874

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex.

Functional MRI was used to test whether instructing subjects to attend to one or another location in a visual scene would affect neural activity in human primary visual cortex. Stimuli were moving gratings restricted to a pair of peripheral, circular apertures, positioned to the right and to the left of a central fixation point. Subjects were trained to perform a motion discrimination task, attending (without moving their eyes) at any moment to one of the two stimulus apertures. Functional MRI responses were recorded while subjects were cued to alternate their attention between the two apertures. Primary visual cortex responses in each hemisphere modulated with the alternation of the cue; responses were greater when the subject attended to the stimuli in the contralateral hemifield. The attentional modulation of the brain activity was about 25% of that evoked by alternating the stimulus with a uniform field.

Attention

Attentional functioning in abstinent cocaine abusers.

The effect of chronic cocaine use on attention is directly relevant to the treatment of cocaine dependence, since attention underlies most other cognitive processes, and thus the ability to profit from cognitively-based interventions. This paper reviews 17 studies examining attention in patients with cocaine abuse or dependence. Findings have been inconsistent, largely due to various methodological difficulties. There has been some suggestion of reduced cognitive speed, while focused and sustained attention have generally been unimpaired. Divided attention has been largely unexplored. Thus, there is insufficient evidence either to accept or reject the hypothesis of attentional dysfunction associated with chronic cocaine use.

Attention