Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8821110

Dramatic decrease in tuberculin skin test conversion rate among employees at a hospital in New York City.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently issued updated guidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis in health care facilities. Many recommendations, including the use of high-efficiency particulate air filter respirators, are expensive to implement and of unproven efficacy. We therefore reviewed the tuberculin skin test conversion rate among our employees from 1991 to 1993, before introduction of high-efficiency particulate air filter respirators. During this period, several other improvements in tuberculosis control were implemented. METHODS: Employee tuberculin test conversion rates were reviewed by 6-month interval from 1991 to 1993. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, several tuberculosis control measures were implemented, including early isolation of patients with suspected cases of tuberculosis in rooms with negative-pressure ventilation, placement of germicidal UV light fixtures into patient rooms and common areas, and use of Technol shields (Technol, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas) (1991), particulate respirators (1992), and dust-mist-fume respirators (1993). With these improvements, the conversion rate among employees fell from 20.7% in the first 6 months of 1991 to 5.8% in the latter half of 1993. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of skin test conversion among our employees decreased before introduction of high-efficiency particulate air filter respirators. This suggests that nosocomial spread of tuberculosis can be decreased by means of previously established, less costly methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Fella, P Rivera, M Hale, K Squires, K Sepkowitz. 1995. Dramatic decrease in tuberculin skin test conversion rate among employees at a hospital in New York City.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-6553(95)90265-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: long-term care concerns.

Colonization of residents of long-term care facilities with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important healthcare concern. MRSA colonization is prevalent; in two of the most common sites of colonization, nares and wounds, colonization rates range from 8% to 53%, and 30% to 82%, respectively. With such a large number of patients harboring the organism, it is imperative that long-term care facilities are knowledgeable regarding the overall significance of MRSA, are aware of MRSA infection rates at their facilities, and have established a threshold above which outbreak precautions will be instituted. More importantly, facilities must ensure that appropriate precautions (e.g., hand washing, glove changes, gowns) are utilized to prevent transmission of MRSA to noncolonized residents. If these basic measures are taken, MRSA-colonized residents of long-term facilities should be able to be fully integrated into the everyday activities within the long-term care environment. In the event of an outbreak of MRSA infection, stricter isolation of colonized and infected residents is warranted, and such isolation should be discontinued as soon as the chain of transmission has been disrupted. Systemic antibiotics should be avoided in asymptomatic colonized patients; topical antibiotics like mupirocin should be reserved for short-term administration in outbreak situations.

Cross Infection

Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the hospital setting.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of nosocomial infections. Healthcare professionals in the United States should develop programs to prevent transmission of this organism within their institutions. Aggressive control efforts are justified for several reasons: (1) the incidence of nosocomial MRSA reflects the general effectiveness of infection control practice; (2) MRSA do not replace susceptible strains but instead increase the overall rate of nosocomial S. aureus infections; (3) MRSA infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality; (4) serious MRSA infections must be treated with vancomycin. Thus, in hospitals with high rates of MRSA, use of this antimicrobial agent increases, which in turn may increase the risk for selecting vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Hospitals have used numerous different approaches to control nosocomial spread of MRSA. Staff should choose a control method based on the prevalence of MRSA in their institution and in their referring facilities, the rate of nosocomial transmission of MRSA in their hospital, the risk factors present in their patient population, the reservoirs and modes of transmission specific to their hospital, and their resources. Any MRSA control plan must stress adherence to basic infection control measures, such as hand washing and contact isolation precautions. In addition, decolonization of patients and staff, control of antimicrobial use, surveillance cultures, and molecular typing may be helpful adjuncts.

Cross Infection