Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8778818

Recent developments in breast imaging.

Abstract

A review of breast imaging has already appeared in 1982 in this journal. Consequently, the present article concentrates on a discussion of only those developments of a more recent nature. Although the emphasis is placed on the physical aspects of the different imaging methods concerned, the essential factors relating to the clinical background and the associated radiation risk are also outlined. The completeness of detail depends on the present clinical importance of the method under discussion. X-ray mammography, which is still the most important breast imaging technique and has proved to be an effective method for breast cancer screening, is therefore treated in greater detail. Since the early 1980s, ultrasound B-mode scanning has evolved to an indispensable adjunct to x-ray mammography. For Doppler sonography, diaphanography, contrast-enhanced MRI, CT and DSA, the visualization of a tumour depends essentially on the enhanced vascularity of the lesion. Whether this will prove to be a reliable indicator for malignancy remains to be shown in controlled clinical studies. Common to all imaging systems is the increasing use of digital methods for signal processing, which also offers the possibility of computer-aided diagnosis by texture analysis and pattern recognition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Säbel, H Aichinger. 1996. Recent developments in breast imaging.. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155%2F41%2F3%2F001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Gadolinium dimeglumine: an alternative contrast agent for digital subtraction angiography.

The aim of this study was to evaluate gadolinium diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA) as an alternative contrast agent for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with renal insufficiency or previous anaphylactic reaction to iodinated contrast agents. We performed 34 DSAs in 31 patients by use of the commercially available 0.5-M Gd-DTPA solution (Magnevist, Schering, Berlin, Germany). The contrast material was power- or hand-injected at the same rate as iodinated contrast material, without exceeding a total amount of 0.4 mmol/kg body weight. In 18 studies Gd-DTPA was the sole contrast agent. In 9 cases gadolinium injections were combined with carbon dioxide. Restricted non-ionic contrast medium injections were administered to complete the examinations in 7 cases and for comparative purposes in 1 case. Cerebral and carotid arteries, one superior limb, abdominal aorta, renal arteries, renal transplants, iliac arteries and inferior limbs were imaged, and ten endovascular interventional procedures, including three transjugular intrahepatic percutaneous stent shunts, were performed. No side effects were observed. Diagnostic angiographic images were obtained in all cases except in 5 of the 8 distal run-off studies. Gadolinium-based contrast can produce clinically useful angiograms in patients with a contra-indication to iodine who must undergo angiography.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction

Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a treatable cause of hypertension and renal failure for which no ideal screening technique is currently available. We evaluated the use of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the diagnosis of RAS. Sixty-two patients with secondary hypertension were enrolled in the study. All patients had conventional renal angiography and gadolinium enhanced MRA. The sequence used was a 3D FMP SPGR sequence with the following parameters (TR: 26 ms, TE: 6.9 ms, flip angle 40 degrees, field of view 36 x 36 cm, matrix 246 x 256, 1 excitation). Gadolinium 0.3 mmol/kg was administered and 60 1. 5-mm-thick partitions were obtained over a duration of 3.5 min. The MRA images were then compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. Conventional DSA demonstrated 138 renal arteries, whereas gadolinium-enhanced MRA demonstrated 129 (93 %). Twenty-one renal artery stenoses and four occluded arteries were seen at conventional DSA. Gadolinium-enhanced MRA had a sensitivity of 88 %, specificity of 98 %, accuracy of 96 %, positive predictive value of 92 % and negative predictive value of 97 % when compared with conventional DSA. Gadolinium-enhanced MRA is an accurate technique for identifying patients with RAS. It is less sensitive in picking up accessory renal arteries.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction