Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8774533

Recognizing syncope: pitfalls and surprises.

Abstract

Loss of consciousness and falling are the key features of syncope. Common accompaniments include tonic and myoclonic muscle activity, eye deviations, automatisms, vocalizations and hallucinations which may render the distinction from epileptic seizures difficult. Differential diagnosis is based on the specific features and not the mere presence of these phenomena. Recognition of syncope depends also on accurate information about precipitants, premonitory symptoms and postictal events: the absence of postictal confusion has been identified as the single most powerful factor discriminating syncope from epileptic seizures whereas incontinence and head injury are common in both conditions. Investigations such as electroencephalogram, tilt testing and postictal prolactin or creatine kinase levels may be helpful but are never diagnostic in isolation. Exceptionally, hypoxic and epileptic mechanisms interact within a single attack.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Lempert. 1996. Recognizing syncope: pitfalls and surprises.. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689608900705

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evidence of a highly specific relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed.

This paper explores the specificity of the relationship between rapid automatic naming and reading fluency. Reading accuracy, rate, and fluency was measured among a sample of 67 children, the majority of whom were very poor readers. Regression analyses revealed that phonological processing tasks predicted reading accuracy and comprehension whereas rapid digit (but not picture) naming predicted reading accuracy and rate. After further controlling reading accuracy, digit naming was still a significant predictor of reading rate. This suggests that rapid alphanumeric naming is a highly specific predictor of reading rate and that rapid digit naming and phonological processing are distinct contributors to different aspects of reading in poor readers.

Automatism↗

Contralateral motor automatisms in neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The lateralizing value of the motor automatisms is generally doubted in most patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. However, subgroup analysis of the seizures of temporal lobe origin suggests a role for motor automatisms in discriminating seizures of neocortical versus mesial temporal lobe origin. METHODS: Video-EEG of a patient with well-defined neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy was reviewed to assess the localizing value of motor automatisms. RESULTS: We report a patient with left upper extremity motor automatisms and clonic movements of the proximal left lower extremity with altered awareness as the sole manifestations of right temporal neocortical seizures. CONCLUSION: Early onset unilateral motor automatisms without dystonic posturing can localize the seizure origin to the contralateral temporal lobe neocortex.

Automatism↗

Is the implicit association test immune to faking?

One of the main advantages of measures of automatic cognition is supposed to be that they are less susceptible to faking than explicit tests. It is an empirical question, however, to what degree these measures can be faked, and the response might well differ for different measures. We tested whether the Implicit Association Test (IAT, Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) cannot be faked as easily as explicit measures of the same constructs. We chose the Big-Five dimensions conscientiousness and extraversion as the constructs of interest. The results show, indeed, that the IAT is much less susceptible to faking than questionnaire measures are, even if no selective faking of single dimensions of the questionnaire occurred. However, given limited experience, scores on the IAT, too, are susceptible to faking.

Automatism↗