Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8771361

Anesthesia systems.

Abstract

In this study we evaluated six anesthesia systems--three systems from each of two manufacturers--used to administer inhalation (general) anesthesia. Because contemporary anesthesia systems are assembled from components that represent proven technology, we focused on whether the systems could meet the needs of a variety of clinical applications and whether they provided clinically useful integration of instrument control and of information presentation. Performance (e.g., accuracy, response time) of individual components was explored only if it became suspect in the course of testing or if problems had been reported by users. We found that all the evaluated systems can be used to deliver anesthesia safely; thus, we rated them Acceptable. We did, however, note differences among the systems with respect to suitability for various types of procedures, degree of integration, and cost. Based on these concerns, we ranked the systems in four groups. Guidance for choosing the system that best meets a healthcare facility's needs is presented in the Anesthesia System Purchasing Strategy Guide at the end of the Evaluation. Also included in this study are a "Glossary of Anesthesia Terms and Abbreviations" and a supplementary article describing a new system that replaces one of the evaluated systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anesthesia systems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8771361/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Sedation by non-anesthesiologists should be centralized for considerations of safety].

Sedation and analgesia for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures outside the operating room by non-anaesthesiologist physicians is becoming more frequent. In reaction to sedation casualties a multidisciplinary committee organized by the National Organization for Quality Assurance in Hospitals (CBO) has developed guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anaesthesiologists for psychologically or physically distressing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In these guidelines the conditions for a qualitatively safe way of sedation or analgesia are being emphasized. It may be expected that with these guidelines sedation and analgesia by non-anaesthesiologists will increase further. With a view to the safety of the patient diagnostic and therapeutic procedures which require sedation for psychological or physical reasons should be concentrated in a diagnostic/therapeutic complex, connected to the operating complex, where it is possible to consult the expertise of an anaesthesiologist.

Anesthesiology