Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8771150

Fine needle sampling without aspiration.

Abstract

Four hundred and ten thyroid nodules, 127 breast lumps and 43 lymph nodes were sampled and analyzed to compare the classical aspiration (ASP) technique with the non aspiration needle jab (NASP) technique. The adequacy of cellularity, significant blood staining and the discomfort felt by the patient were assessed and statistically analyzed. The non aspiration technique was found to be superior to the classical aspiration technique for fine needle sampling of thyroid in all aspects. However, for breast lesions, while the discomfort felt and the staining with blood was less with the non aspiration technique, the overall cellular yield was unsatisfactory. The adequacy of cellular yield was, however, comparable for malignant breast lesions with either technique. For lymph node sampling, both techniques showed equivalent results with regard to the cellularity but, the NASP technique was superior in other aspects. Although the overall patient discomfort and blood staining was significantly less, the adequacy of the cellularity was influenced by the site and the nature of the lesion. Thus it can be concluded that the technique needs to be selected depending on the anatomic site, the clinical situation, the personal experience and the preference of the operator.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M P Kumarasinghe, A H Sheriffdeen. 1995. Fine needle sampling without aspiration.. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313029500169243

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗