Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8762717

Differences between stereopsis, interocular correlation and binocularity.

Abstract

In normal human subjects, evoked potentials in response to depth reversing two-color dynamic random-dot stereograms disappeared or were greatly reduced at equiluminance, whereas responses to shifts between patterns that were correlated and anticorrelated (for the two eyes) were, for most subjects, actually larger at equiluminance than at non-equiluminance. Responses were only slightly diminished at equiluminance to similar texture-shifting patterns that were identical to the two eyes. These results suggest that a significant fraction of cells with input from both eyes can respond to correlation/anticorrelation shifts, yet are not involved in stereopsis. Also, binocular rivalry may gate the responses of these binocular-nonstereoscopic units.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M S Livingstone. 1996. Differences between stereopsis, interocular correlation and binocularity.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00175-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The popout in some conjunction searches is due to perceptual grouping.

The target in a visual search task usually pops out if it can be distinguished from its background on the basis of only one visual feature but not if the target represents a conjunction of two or more features. However, several recent reports suggest that in certain cases, search targets defined by a conjunction of two features also pop out. We have reinvestigated three pairs of such features to determine whether the popout in these cases can be attributed to perceptual grouping. We find that that in all three cases, popout no longer occurs when perceptual grouping is degraded, suggesting that the popout is the result of perceptual grouping and not of novel mechanism/s of conjunction search.

Depth Perception

Variational learning in nonlinear gaussian belief networks.

We view perceptual tasks such as vision and speech recognition as inference problems where the goal is to estimate the posterior distribution over latent variables (e.g., depth in stereo vision) given the sensory input. The recent flurry of research in independent component analysis exemplifies the importance of inferring the continuous-valued latent variables of input data. The latent variables found by this method are linearly related to the input, but perception requires nonlinear inferences such as classification and depth estimation. In this article, we present a unifying framework for stochastic neural networks with nonlinear latent variables. Nonlinear units are obtained by passing the outputs of linear gaussian units through various nonlinearities. We present a general variational method that maximizes a lower bound on the likelihood of a training set and give results on two visual feature extraction problems. We also show how the variational method can be used for pattern classification and compare the performance of these nonlinear networks with other methods on the problem of handwritten digit recognition.

Depth Perception

The effects of stereoscopic depth on completion.

Stereoscopic depth has a critical effect on completion of partially occluded figures. However, it has not strictly been distinguished whether the effect is direct or indirect through alteration of contour segmentation or parsing. Here, I report that stereoscopic depth does not influence completion of partially occluded figures when parsing is unambiguous from motion cues. This is consistent with the present proposal that stereoscopic depth does not have a unique role in completion and that it is one of the cues to contour segmentation or parsing, which in turn influences completion and surface representation, like motion, shape, or transparency.

Depth Perception