Perceived motion in depth.

E Brenner; A V Van Den Berg; W J Van Damme

doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00146-8

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8762300

Perceived motion in depth.

E Brenner·A V Van Den Berg·W J Van Damme

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We examine how various sources of information contribute to the percept of motion in depth. Subjects were presented with targets moving in depth, and were asked to judge their velocities and final positions. On each presentation, the target's position relative to the two eyes (target vergence), the size of the target's retinal image and the difference in this image's position relative to that of the background in the two eyes (relative disparity), each either changed as they normally would for a target moving at a fixed speed towards the observer, or did not change at all. Subjects' judgements for various such combinations show that all three sources of information influence both the perceived velocity of motion in depth and the final perceived position, but in different ways. This is not too surprising, because the assumptions that the use of each source of information are based on, are different for the two tasks. We propose that the way the different sources are combined is governed by the likelihood of the assumptions, that are required to use that information, being true under the given circumstances.

Explore related subjects

Depth Perception Humans Motion Perception Vision, Binocular Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

E Brenner, A V Van Den Berg, W J Van Damme. 1996. Perceived motion in depth.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00146-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

The effects of phase on the perception of 3D shape from texture: psychophysics and modeling.

Two experiments are reported in which observers judged the apparent shapes of elliptical cylinders with eight different textures that were presented with scrambled and unscrambled phase spectra. The results revealed that the apparent depths of these surfaces varied linearly with the ground truth in all conditions, and that the overall magnitude of surface relief was systematically underestimated. In general, the apparent depth of a surface is significantly attenuated when the phase spectrum of its texture is randomly scrambled, though the magnitude of this effect varies for different types of texture. A new computational model of 3D shape from texture is proposed in which apparent depth is estimated from the relative density of edges in different local regions of an image, and the predictions of this model are highly correlated with the observers' judgments.

Depth Perception↗

PubMed2006

Visual saliency and texture segregation without feature gradient.

A central notion in the study of texture segregation is that of feature gradient (or feature contrast). In orientation-based texture segregation, orientation gradients have indeed played a fundamental role in explaining behavioral results. Here, however, we show that general, smoothly varying, orientation-defined textures (ODTs) exhibit striking perceptual singularities that are completely unpredictable from orientation gradients. These singularities defy not only popular texture segregation theories but also virtually all computational segmentation methods, and they confound previous behavioral studies with smoothly varying ODTs. We provide psychophysical evidence that perceptual singularities in smooth ODTs are salient visual features consistent across observers and with significant effect on the perception and segregation of oriented textures. We further show that, although orientation gradients cannot predict them, perceptual singularities in smooth ODTs emerge directly from, and can be spatially localized by, two ODT curvatures. Given the traditional role of feature gradients in early vision, the significance of these findings extends well beyond orientation-based texture segregation to issues ranging from curve integration and fragment grouping, through the perception of 3D shape, to the functional organization of the primary visual cortex.

Depth Perception↗

PubMed2006

Orientation-specific computation in stereoscopic vision.

The left and right eyes receive subtly different images from a visual scene. Binocular disparities of retinal image locations are correlated with variation in the depth of objects in the scene and make stereoscopic depth perception possible. Disparity stereoscopically specifies a stimulus; changing the stimulus in a way that conserves its disparity leaves the stimulus stereoscopically unchanged. Therefore, a person's ability to use stereo to see the depth separating any two objects should depend only on the disparities of the objects, which in turn depend on where the objects are, not what they are. However, I find that the disparity difference between two stimuli by itself predicts neither stereoacuity nor perceived depth. Human stereo vision is shown here to be most sensitive at detecting the relative depth of two gratings when they are parallel. Rotating one grating by as little as 10 degrees lowers sensitivity. The rotation can make a perceptible depth separation invisible, although it changes neither the relative nor absolute disparities of the gratings, only their relative orientations. The effect of relative orientation is not confined to stimuli that, like gratings, vary along one dimension or to stimuli perceived to have a dominant orientation. Rather, it is the relative orientation of the one-dimensional components of stimuli, even broadband stimuli, that matters. This limit on stereoscopic depth perception appears to be intrinsic to the visual system's computation of disparity; by taking place within orientation bands, the computation renders the coding of disparity inseparable from the coding of orientation.

Depth Perception↗