Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8762248

[Computerized anesthesia record. How far have we gone?].

Abstract

There are more and more computerized anaesthetic records becoming available from various constructors. However, the setting up and operation of such a product depends on the development of concepts in computing. The second technological breakthrough, currently underway, is challenging principles which had seemed accepted up until now. The technical development concerns computer processing units, RAM or ROM. The development in software influences the operation of networks, multiple task and object programming. The graphic interface becomes the centre of this second revolution. All of these developments should be included in the proposed computerized anaesthetic records. Three factors determine the realisation of such a product: control of the data collecting process, the man-machine interface and the utilisation of storing data. The computerized anaesthetic record should be of open conception, allowing communication with all of the data bases and providing an interface with all the monitors and ventilators used in operating and recovery rooms. Now is the time to install the infrastructure network in operating and recovery rooms and to be thinking of acquiring the new generations of computerized anaesthetic records.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Landais, E Peyry, O Dolhem, T Aviles, H Viard. 1996. [Computerized anesthesia record. How far have we gone?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8762248/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗