Parallel processing in visual short-term memory.

S Magnussen; M W Greenlee; J P Thomas

doi:10.1037//0096-1523.22.1.202

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8742262

Parallel processing in visual short-term memory.

S Magnussen·M W Greenlee·J P Thomas

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Visual short-term memory for the contrast and spatial frequency of sinusoidal gratings was measured in a delayed discrimination task in which the 2 stimuli to be compared were separated in time by 1-10 s interstimulus intervals (ISIs). Delayed discrimination thresholds for spatial frequency and contrast were compared, both when the 2 types of thresholds were measured in separate blocks of trials and when the 2 types of measures were randomly intermixed in an uncertainty paradigm, which required participants to process information about both dimensions on each trial. In both cases, accuracy of memory for spatial frequency was independent of ISI, but memory for contrast decreased as ISI increased. Performance was lower in the uncertainty case, but only by an amount predicted by statistical decision theory for independent sources. The results are consistent with a model assuming a set of parallel special-purpose visual discrimination and short-term memory mechanisms.

Explore related subjects

Differential Threshold Form Perception Humans Memory, Short-Term Space Perception Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

S Magnussen, M W Greenlee, J P Thomas. 1996. Parallel processing in visual short-term memory.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-1523.22.1.202

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Recruitment stability in masseter motor units during isometric voluntary contractions.

Recruitment of single motor units (SMUs) of the masseter muscle was studied using macro representation (MacroRep) as the indicator of motor unit size. When subjects followed a slow isometric force ramp, units were usually recruited in order of MacroRep size. However, pooling the data from repeated ramps in the same subject resulted in a weak relationship between MacroRep size and force recruitment threshold, probably due to marked variations in the relative contributions of the jaw muscles, and varying levels of cocontraction, in the development of total bite force in each ramp. The force recruitment thresholds of individual SMUs showed marked variability, but recruitment threshold stability was improved when expressed as a percentage of maximum surface electromyographic (SEMG) activity in the ipsilateral masseter. Therefore the SEMG recruitment threshold was concluded to be a more stable and accurate indicator of the SMU's position in the recruitment hierarchy in a given muscle. It was concluded that SMUs in masseter are recruited according to the size principle, and that when investigating recruitment in jaw muscles, SEMG recruitment threshold should be used in preference to force recruitment threshold.

Differential Threshold↗

PubMed1998

Examining edge- and region-based texture analysis mechanisms.

Instantaneous texture discrimination performance was examined for different texture stimuli to uncover the use of edge-based and region-based texture analysis mechanisms. Textures were composed of randomly placed, short, oriented line segments. Line segment orientation was chosen randomly using a Gaussian distribution (described by a mean and a standard deviation). One such distribution determined the orientations on the left side of the image, and a second distribution was used for the right side. The two textures either abutted to form an edge or were separated by a blank region. A texture difference in mean orientation led to superior discrimination performance when the textures abutted. On the other hand, when the textures differed in the standard deviation of the orientation distribution, performance was similar in the two conditions. These results suggest that edge-based texture analysis mechanisms were used (i.e. were the most sensitive) in the abutting difference-in-mean case, but region-based texture analysis mechanisms were used in the other three cases.

Differential Threshold↗

PubMed1998

Lines and Gabor functions compared as spatial visual stimuli.

Foveal discrimination thresholds were measured for orientation, vernier alignment, bisection, displacement detection and stereoscopic acuity using simple line stimuli and also sinusoidal grating patches with gaussian intensity modulation (Gabor stimuli). Stimulus parameters such as luminance, exposure duration, component separation and, as far as possible, length were identical for both. Orientation discrimination as a function of length is almost identical for the two classes of stimuli, some observers performing slightly better with Gabor patches. Thresholds for displacement detection are also the same. Vernier, stereo and bisection acuities, however, are considerable better with line than with Gabor stimuli.

Differential Threshold↗