Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8711826

[Laparoscopic technique--which developments are possible?].

Abstract

The progress of laparoscopy is influenced by both the medical and technical aspects. The development of endoscopes and various rigid instruments has increased the indication options. Nevertheless, several drawbacks remain, e.g. the limited spatial view, the missing sense of touch, and reduced mobility in the operation area. New 3D visual systems now introduce spatial view. Flexible instruments are being developed that allow thorough examination of organs. While these enhancements are now becoming available, research and development are making progress and preparing the next steps. One vision is the development of a telepresence and telemanipulation system. With it, at the patient's side we will have an endoscope guidance system and several instrument guidance systems, which will be telemanipulated from a control station. At the control station, a 3D picture from the operation scene, together with virtual reality simulation pictures will be available. Force reflection as well as palpatory sensing information will be readily available to the telesurgeon. These new developments will improve the quality of the surgery for the benefit of both the patient and surgeon. Furthermore, the training of new surgeons will be eased by the use of sophisticated simulators using virtual reality techniques. These and further technical developments will not only lead to an improvement in current laparoscopy procedures, but it can be expected that additional procedures will be developed that are not yet possible and accessible to laparoscopy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

U Voges. 1996. [Laparoscopic technique--which developments are possible?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8711826/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

What is left of i.v. urography?

Since its introduction into clinical practice in the early 1930s, intravenous urography (IVU) was the primary imaging technique for the investigation of urinary system disorders for many years, until the advent of digital cross-sectional-imaging techniques gradually started to undermine many of its indications. Intravenous urography has been superseded for some indications such as renovascular arterial hypertension, prostatic dysuria, renal failure, palpable abdominal masses and recurrent urinary tract infection in women. Intravenous urography has been reduced, in the sense that it is no longer a primary examination, for other clinical indications such as renal colic, renal trauma, uroseptic fever, asymptomatic haematuria, medical haematuria, obstructive uropathies and follow-up of various disorders. Intravenous urography is indicated and often mandatory in congenital anomalies of the urinary tract, prior to endourological procedures, possible fistulas, renal transplantation, tuberculosis and ureteral pathology. In conclusion, IVU is still the examination of choice where there is a need to visualize the entire urinary system and to evaluate the state of the papillae and calyces. Computed tomography urography and MR urography are the imaging modalities ready in the near future to replace IVU.

Female Urogenital Diseases↗

The legal framework covering the practice of genitourinary medicine in the UK: the Venereal Diseases Regulations.

The legal framework governing the practice of genitourinary medicine is traced from 1916 to the present. The first legislation, the Public Health (Venereal Diseases) Regulations of 1916 was comprehensive, and accompanied by guidance on setting up outpatient clinics and their supporting laboratories with practical advice on taking samples to support clinical diagnosis. Confidentiality was emphasized. The regulations led to the development of a nationwide network of clinics providing free care, open at times convenient to the public, and situated in general hospitals in large centres of population. Most of the principles still apply. Subsequent legislation centred on maintaining the confidentiality of all information obtained in relation to persons examined or treated for venereal disease, but allows transfer of details between healthcare providers to facilitate care and contact tracing. While the initial regulations stated that the venereal diseases were syphilis, gonorrhoea and chancroid, the legislation now covers all sexually transmitted diseases.

Female Urogenital Diseases↗