Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8689448

Antineoplastic agents.

Abstract

Advances in the field of oncology have led to the development of many antineoplastic agents for the treatment of cancer. Combination with other agents and modalities, along with dose intensification, has resulted in more toxicities, often requiring careful management and monitoring in the critical care setting. Critical care nurses must meet this challenge by expanding their knowledge of antineoplastic therapy in order to skillfully care for these patients. The six major categories of antineoplastics, mechanism of action, indications for use, common route of administration, and major side effects are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P A Carlson. 1996. Antineoplastic agents.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002727-199602000-00002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Glucosylceramide synthase does not attenuate the ceramide pool accumulating during apoptosis induced by CD95 or anti-cancer regimens.

Ceramide (Cer) accumulating during the execution phase of apoptosis is generated from plasma membrane sphingomyelin (SM), which gains access to a sphingomyelinase due to phospholipid scrambling (Tepper, A. D., Ruurs, P., Wiedmer, T., Sims, P., Borst, J., and van Blitterswijk, W. J. (2000) J. Cell. Biol. 150, 155-164). To evaluate the functional significance of this Cer pool, we aimed to convert it to glucosylceramide (GlcCer), by constitutive overexpression of glucosylceramide synthase (GCS). Jurkat cells, retrovirally transduced with GCS cDNA, showed a 10-12-fold increase in GCS activity in vitro and a 7-fold elevated basal GlcCer level in vivo. However, Cer accumulating during apoptosis induced by ligation of the death receptor CD95, treatment with the anti-cancer drug etoposide, or exposure to gamma-radiation was not glycosylated by GCS. Likewise, Cer liberated at the plasma membrane by bacterial SMase was not converted by the enzyme. Thus, GCS, located at the Golgi, is topologically segregated from Cer produced in the plasma membrane. In contrast, de novo synthesized Cer as well as an exogenously supplied cell-permeable Cer analog were efficiently glycosylated, apparently due to different Cer topology and distinct physicochemical behavior of the synthetic Cer species, respectively. Exogenous cell-permeable Cer species, despite their conversion by GCS, effectively induced apoptosis. We also observed that GCS activity is down-regulated in cells undergoing apoptosis. In conclusion, GCS can convert de novo synthesized Cer but not SM-derived Cer, and, therefore, the ability of GCS overexpression to protect cells from possible detrimental effects of Cer accumulation is limited.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Increased nucleotide excision repair in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells: role of ERCC1-XPF.

Increased platinum-DNA adduct removal has been shown by several DNA repair assays to be associated with cisplatin resistance in the A2780/C-series human ovarian cancer model system. In the present study, we provide further evidence that the resistance phenotype of these cell lines is due, in part, to enhanced nucleotide excision repair (NER). Cisplatin resistance was found to be associated with increased UV resistance. Northern blot analysis revealed that increased expression of ERCC1 was also associated with cisplatin resistance in this panel. Several other NER genes were found to be constitutively overexpressed in the most resistant cell line, C200, as compared with the parental A2780 cells. A plasmid substrate containing a site-specific cisplatin adduct was used to measure the nucleotide excision activity of cell extracts prepared from cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant cells. Using this in vitro assay, extracts prepared from C200 cells exhibited approximately 3-fold more activity than extracts prepared from A2780 cells, similar to the difference in UV sensitivity. Complementation of A2780 extracts with ERCC1-XPF protein resulted in approximately 2-fold increased activity, but had little effect on excision in C200 extracts. Overall, these results support a role for the ERCC1-XPF endonuclease as a determinant of increased NER in this cisplatin resistance model.

Antineoplastic Agents↗