Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8676560

[Bone densitometry].

I Yamamoto·R Morita
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recently, several methods for measurement of bone density have been developed. Among them, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is now considered to be a standard method in bone densitometry. In most cases, values by DXA measurement reflect bone strength and thus measurements of lumbar spine and femoral neck by DXA are used for diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. In several clinical trials of new drugs, measurement of DXA proved to be very useful. Other methods such as DXA for os radius or os calcaneus are also useful for screening of general osteopenia and quantitative ultrasound is widely used for mass-screening of osteoporosis because of its convenience. Radiographic absorptiometry is also a convenient method, which can be performed only by taking an X-ray photograph with an aluminum phantom. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a method which enables measurement of trabecular true bone density as well as an analysis of trabecular structure and peripheral QCT, aimed for measurement of peripheral bones, is also expected to be a sensitive method to monitor therapeutic responses. Since several methods are now available, it is important to choose a method which is the most suitable for the purpose of each bone mineral measurement.

Explore related subjects

Absorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Yamamoto, R Morita. 1996. [Bone densitometry].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8676560/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Anabolic effects of nandrolone decanoate in patients receiving dialysis: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Patients receiving dialysis commonly experience malnutrition, reduced muscle mass (sarcopenia), and fatigue for which no effective treatment has been identified. Anabolic steroids are known to increase muscle mass and strength in healthy individuals, but their effect on the sarcopenia and fatigue associated with long-term dialysis has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of an anabolic steroid, nandrolone decanoate, on lean body mass (LBM), functional status, and quality of life in dialysis patients. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between April 1996 and July 1997. SETTING: Hospital-based outpatient dialysis unit. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients undergoing dialysis for at least 3 months. INTERVENTION: Nandrolone decanoate, 100 mg (n = 14), or placebo (n = 15) by intramuscular injection once a week for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight, LBM, fatigue, grip strength, walking and stair-climbing times, and treadmill performance after 3 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Lean body mass increased significantly in patients given nandrolone compared with patients given placebo (mean change [SD], +4.5 [2.3] kg; P<.001 compared with baseline). This effect was significantly greater than the change in LBM in the placebo group (mean change [SD], +1.9 [1.6] kg; P = .003 compared with baseline; P = .005 compared with nandrolone group). Serum creatinine levels increased in the nandrolone group (+168 [203] mmol/L [1.9 [2.3] mg/dL]; P = .02) but not in the placebo group (-4.0 [177] mmol/L [0.04 [2.0] mg/dL]; P = .95), suggesting an increase in muscle mass. Time to complete the walking and stair-climbing test decreased from 36.5 to 32.7 seconds in the nandrolone group, while those in the placebo group increased from 38.7 to 42.1 seconds (P = .05). Peak oxygen consumption increased in the individuals in the nandrolone group who performed treadmill tests, but not to a statistically significant degree. Grip strength did not change in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with nandrolone for 6 months resulted in a significant increase in LBM associated with functional improvement in patients undergoing dialysis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1999

Environmental exposure to cadmium, forearm bone density, and risk of fractures: prospective population study. Public Health and Environmental Exposure to Cadmium (PheeCad) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low-level exposure to cadmium may promote calcium loss via urinary excretion. We undertook a prospective population study to investigate whether environmental exposure to cadmium lowers bone density and increases risk of fractures. METHODS: We measured urinary cadmium excretion, a biomarker of lifetime exposure, in people from ten districts of Belgium, of which six districts bordered on three zinc smelters. We also measured cadmium in soil and in vegetables from the districts, and collected data on incidence of fractures and height loss. Bone density was measured at the forearm just above the wrist by single photon absorptiometry, and calculated as the mean of six proximal and four distal scans. FINDINGS: Mean cadmium excretion at baseline was 8.7 nmol daily. Across the ten districts, mean cadmium concentration in soil ranged from 0.8 to 14.7 mg/kg, and from 0.1 to 4.0 mg/kg dry weight in vegetables. Median follow-up was 6.6 years. Mean forearm bone density in proximal and distal scans was 0.54 g/cm2 and 0.43 g/cm2 in men, and 0.44 g/cm2 and 0.34 g/cm2 in women. In postmenopausal women, a twofold increase in urinary cadmium correlated with 0.01 g/cm2 decrease in bone density (p<0.02). The relative risks associated with doubled urinary cadmium were 1.73 (95% CI 1.16-2.57; p=0.007) for fractures in women and 1.60 (0.94-2.72, p=0.08) for height loss in men. Cadmium excretion in districts near smelters was 22.8% higher (p=0.001) than in other districts, with fracture rates of 16.0 and 10.3 cases per 1000 person-years, respectively, and a population-attributable risk of 35.0%. INTERPRETATION: Even at a low degree of environmental exposure, cadmium may promote skeletal demineralisation, which may lead to increased bone fragility and raised risk of fractures.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗