Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8657872

Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis.

Abstract

The future of image processing and CAD in diagnostic radiology is more promising now than ever, with increasingly impressive results being reported from various observer performance studies in both mammography and chest radiography. Clinical trials in years to come will help optimize the accuracy of the programs and determine the actual contribution of CAD to the interpretation process. Radiologists using output from computer analyses of images, however, will still make the final decision regarding diagnosis and patient management. Nonetheless, studies have indicated that the computer output need not have greater overall accuracy than a given radiologist in order to improve his or her performance. A systematic and gradual introduction of CAD into radiology departments will be necessary so that radiologists can become familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of each CAD program, thereby avoiding either excessive reliance or a dismissive attitude toward the computer output. This should ensure the acceptance of CAD and optimal diagnostic performance by the radiologist. Thus, an appropriate role for each CAD program will be determined for each radiologist, according to his or her individual training and observational skills, reducing intraobserver variations and improving diagnostic performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Giger, H MacMahon. 1996. Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8657872/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.

BACKGROUND: New technology for computer-assisted screening of cervical smears that uses neural networks could potentially decrease numbers of screening errors and improve productivity. We assessed an interactive automated system (PAPNET) for primary screening of cervical smears. METHODS: In January, 1997, the National Health Service research and development programme sponsored a multicentre trial to investigate the use of PAPNET for classification of routine cervical smears as negative or needing further microscopic review. compared with conventional primary screening. The study complied with international standards for assessment of automated cervical screening systems. 21,700 smears were analysed by the two methods and were classified as inadequate, negative, mild, moderate, or severe dyskaryosis, invasion, glandular neoplasia, and borderline nuclear changes. 2906 abnormal smears and 298 negative smears were sent for independent cytological review (gold standard). We calculated sensitivity and specificity relative to the findings of the independent review. FINDINGS: Agreement of 89.8% between the two methods was shown for all classifications of smears that were adequate for reporting. The sensitivity was similar for correctly identified abnormal smears on PAPNET-assisted (82%) and conventional screening (83%). PAPNET-assisted screening showed significantly better specificity (77%) than conventional screening (42%) for identification of negative smears. The total mean time for screening and reporting for conventional screening was 10.4 min per smear, and for PAPNET-assisted screening was 3.9 min. INTERPRETATION: Use of PAPNET-assisted screening could increase quality and productivity. We recommend carefully organised and controlled development projects for the introduction of PAPNET-assisted primary screening of cervical smears.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted

[Computer program for retinopathy of prematurity screening].

BACKGROUND: The goal of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening is complete detection of all preterm infants with threshold ROP. AIM: We wanted to develop software to facilitate registration of ROP findings, checking due dates of re-examination, and evaluation of screening data. By means of complete and faultless registration and evaluation of the data of preterm infants, the effectiveness and safety of the screening should increase. METHODS: We developed software that runs under Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Windows 95 and is programmed in Microsoft Access Basic and Microsoft Visual Basic. The software allows all screening data to be registered and evaluated. Intuitive handling, third level of normalization in database architecture, and automatic plausibility checks guarantee the utmost integrity of data and efficacy of database. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: To date, the software has been used routinely in 2000 examinations in 1000 preterm infants. Our software facilitates clinical management and evaluation of ROP screening, which therefore becomes more safe.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted