PubMed · 8643749
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M C O'Donovan, M J Owen. 1996. Dynamic mutations and psychiatric genetics.. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700033663
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) is a cancer syndrome with well-characterized causative mutations. Missense mutations in approximately 15 codons of the RET gene have been linked to disease phenotypes in the vast majority of cases. These missense mutations range from very simple single nucleotide base changes to more numerous changes at a given codon; they therefore are often tested for by more than one DNA-based diagnostic method. We developed and evaluated a Pyrosequencing technology-based approach for MEN2 mutation testing that allows both simple and complex mutations to be analyzed on one platform. METHODS: Archived DNA from peripheral blood of patients referred to the Mayo Clinic Molecular Genetics laboratory for MEN2 testing was selected. One to all of codons 609, 611, 618, 620, 630, 634, 768, 804, and 918 were analyzed by Pyrosequencing technology to match the original analysis of each patient. Template PCRs were set up using an automated liquid handler; the subsequent post-PCR preparation step was performed manually, and the sequencing was performed by a PSQ 96 instrument. Samples were tested in batch sizes expected to occur routinely. RESULTS: We analyzed samples from 217 patients who previously tested negative for MEN2 and 230 patients who previously tested positive, for a total of 1449 sequencing reactions. One discrepant result was found (100% concordant for negatives and 99.6% concordant for positives). A total of 37 unique mutations or alterations of unknown significance were analyzed. CONCLUSION: Pyrosequencing technology offers an accurate, nonisotopic, simple, and rapid method for the analysis of DNA from patients suspected of having MEN2.
BACKGROUND: Histological anomalies associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH) have been scarcely reported. In some patients susceptible to MH (MHS), central cores have been identified and a genetic association has been proposed, but multiminicore lesions have not been systematically reported. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between multiminicores and MHS in a large family with MH with an approach combining histology, in vitro contracture tests, and genetic analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine members of an MH family (147 members) were investigated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Muscle biopsy specimens were analyzed histologically and with in vitro contracture tests. Genetic analyses were performed to determine the presence of mutations in the ryanodine receptor (RYR1) gene. RESULTS: According to the gold standard in vitro contracture tests, 17 patients were diagnosed as having MHS and 10 as not being susceptible. Multiminicores were found in 16 of the 17 MHS patients and in a single nonsusceptible participant. A linkage between the MH trait and the RYR1 locus in chromosome 19 was demonstrated, whereas no already known mutations were found. Two missense heterozygous mutations (R2676W and T2787S) were identified from sequencing of the entire coding complementary DNA. Overall, we found a significant association between MHS and the presence of multiminicores (chi(2) = 26.5, P<.001) on the one hand and the presence of new mutations in the RYR1 gene (chi(2) = 19.0, P<.001) on the other hand. This remarkably high occurrence of multiminicores in an MHS family is uncommon, and genetic analyses indicate that the association between multiminicores and MHS is linked to a novel R2656W and T2787S substitution present on the same allele of the RYR1 gene. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that multiminicore lesions are observed in MHS patients with neither clinical signs related to multiminicore disease nor histological features of congenital myopathies. These multiminicore lesions may be secondary to mutations in the RYR1 gene. As a consequence, these patients must be distinguished from patients with multiminicore disease and from other MHS patients for whom multiminicores are not observed.