Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8643267

Recovery after tonsillectomy: electrodissection vs. sharp dissection techniques.

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that electrodissection tonsillectomy is associated with increased pain and delayed healing in comparison with sharp techniques for tonsillectomy. To better define the clinical significance of this difference, a detailed study of the time course of recovery was undertaken in adults and children after tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy by the sharp or electrodissection method. For electrodissection tonsillectomy, electrocautery set to 20 W was used for dissection and hemostasis, and after sharp dissection the suction electrocautery was used only selectively at bleeding sites. Daily pain scores were recorded for 2 weeks, and return to normal diet and activities was monitored. In adults the electrodissection tonsillectomy (n = 26) resulted in an average delay of 2 days in recovery from pain (p < 0.05) and a 2-day delay in return to a normal diet (p < 0.05) compared with sharp tonsillectomy (n = 24). In children (aged 2 to 12 years) the electrodissection technique (n = 26) resulted in an average delay trend of 1 to 1.5 days (not significant) compared with the sharp method (n = 24). Electrodissection tonsillectomy results in an average delay in recovery of 2 days for adults and in a lesser delay in pediatric patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D B Wexler. 1996. Recovery after tonsillectomy: electrodissection vs. sharp dissection techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0194-59989670249-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of treating obstructive sleep apnea by tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy on obesity in children.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is common in obese children who have enlarged tonsils and adenoids. OBJECTIVE: To determine if treatment of obstructive sleep apnea by tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy will result in normalization of an obese child's weight, as it does in underweight children, and as it does with other signs and symptoms. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. We recorded weight and height changes after tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy and compared changes of the obese and morbidly obese patients with those of the other patients. SETTING: A tertiary care inner-city hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Children (n = 45) who underwent tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy for obstructive sleep apnea in 1994-1995; their mean (+/-SD) age was 4.9+/-2.4 years at operation. RESULTS: At the time of surgery, 25 children were of normal weight; 3, underweight; 7, obese; and 10, morbidly obese. Postoperatively, 31 children (69%), including 10 of the 17 who were obese or morbidly obese, had substantial weight gain: the z score +/- SD for weight of the entire group increased from 1.37+/-2.49 to 2+/-2.27 (P<.001). The mean z score +/- SD for height increased from 0.03+/-1.08 to 0.58+/-0.94 (P<.001). The body mass index (BMI or Quetelet index): calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters increased in 28 patients (62%) (P = .004). CONCLUSION: Treating obstructive sleep apnea by tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy is associated with increased gain in height, weight, and body mass index in most children, including the obese and morbidly obese.

Adenoidectomy

Sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia induced with propofol or sevoflurane in small children: induction and recovery characteristics.

PURPOSE: To compare the induction and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia induced with either propofol or sevoflurane in pediatric outpatients. METHODS: Fifty-two children, aged 1-3 yr, presenting for ambulatory adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to receive 3 mg.kg-1 propofol i.v. or sevoflurane 8% inspired concentration for induction of anesthesia. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.2 mg.kg-1 mivacurium. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen (FiO2 0.3) and sevoflurane approximately 3-5% inspired concentration with controlled ventilation. Intubation was assessed by an anesthetist blinded to the induction method. Recovery characteristics were compared using the modified Aldrete scoring system, the Pain/Discomfort scale and measuring specific recovery times. A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the children's well-being at home. RESULTS: Intubating conditions were similar in both groups. Emergence from anesthesia occurred earlier with sevoflurane for induction than with propofol (11 +/- 4 vs 17 +/- 7 min (mean +/- SD), P = 0.0002). More children in the sevoflurane group achieved full points on the modified Aldrete scoring system during the first 20 min after anesthesia (P < 0.05). However, children in the sevoflurane group scored higher in the Pain/Discomfort scale at 10 min after anesthesia (P = 0.04) and were given postoperative analgesics earlier than children in the propofol group (13 +/- 5 min vs 18 +/- 11 min, P = 0.03). The time to meet discharge criteria and recovery at home were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of sevoflurane anesthesia with propofol for day-case adenoidectomy results in longer, but more calm, early recovery but does not delay discharge or affect recovery at home.

Adenoidectomy