Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8567410

A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.

Abstract

A linear (frequency-domain) model of the cat cochlea (implemented in both 1- and 2-dimensional versions) has been developed which uses outer hair cell (OHC) forces in a geometry which includes the longitudinal (base-to-apex) tilt of the outer hair cells (OHCs). When positive (contractile) real OHC force-constants are used, very large (50 + dB) response peaks along with very rapidly accumulating phase lags (which can reach -50 pi radians) are obtained. The wider the longitudinal segmentation, the broader the peaks and the less the phase accumulation; 71-microns segmentation produced the most realistic responses. These large response peaks are achieved by a small zone of negative resistance (ca. 1 mm) just basal to the response peak and the virtual 'zeroing' of the basilar membrane's effective impedance over the entire peak region (ca. 2.5 mm). To produce these peaks, the OHCs generate about 25-times the incoming acoustic power. Inclusion of low-pass filtering in the model's OHC representation produces, by contrast, very unrealistic notch-and-peak displacement complexes accompanied by very large phase lags, for all segmentation widths used. However, when phase reversals of OHC forces are also added, achieved by imbedding a resonant system within the tectorial membrane, very realistic peaks and phase functions are produced. More power must, however, be generated by the OHCs (about 70-times the incoming). The end result is output which mimics quite closely the living basilar membrane's responses to low-intensity high-frequency tones.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C D Geisler, C Sang. 1995. A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(95)00064-b

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The midlatency auditory evoked potential P50 is abnormal in Huntington's disease.

The P50 (or P1) potential is a midlatency auditory evoked response, believed to be partially generated by the cholinergic pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) neurons that give rise to the ascending reticular activating system (RAS). We compared the P50 potential in 11 Huntington's disease (HD) patients and 13 normal controls using a paired click stimulus paradigm. HD patients exhibited a P50 potential with reduced amplitude and increased latency to the first stimulus of the pair (first P50 potential), suggesting impaired ascending reticular activating system function, which may contribute to sleep disorders seen in HD. Sensory gating, measured as the percent ratio of the second P50 potential amplitude to the first P50 potential amplitude, was reduced at 250 and 500 ms interstimulus intervals (ISI), which may be related to disordered attention and anxiety in HD.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Cats can detect repeated noise stimuli.

We assessed the ability of cats to detect repeated noise (RN), a stimulus generated by seamlessly presenting short segments of white noise in a continuous loop, in a modified go-nogo task. A recent study of the gerbil suggested that animals might have an extremely limited ability to detect RN compared to human subjects. We find that cats can discriminate RN from continuous noise with reasonable accuracy until the period length of the RN sequence reaches 450-500 ms. This is slightly longer than the maximum detectable RN period length found in gerbils, but falls far short of human performance.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Neuronal activity in the inferior colliculus and bordering structures during vocalization in the squirrel monkey.

In four squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), the inferior colliculus, together with the neighboring superior colliculus, reticular formation, cuneiform nucleus and parabrachial area, were explored with microelectrodes, looking for neurons that might be involved in the discrimination between self-produced and external sounds. Vocalization was elicited by kainic acid injections into the periaqueductal gray of the midbrain. Acoustic tests were carried out with ascending and descending narrow-band noise sweeps spanning virtually the whole hearing range of the squirrel monkey. Altogether 577 neurons were analyzed. Neurons that both were audiosensitive and fired in advance of self-produced vocalization were found almost exclusively in the pericentral nuclei of the inferior colliculus and the adjacent reticular formation. Only the latter, however, contained, in addition, neurons that fired during external acoustic stimulation, but remained quiet during self-produced vocalization. These findings suggest that the reticular formation bordering the inferior colliculus is involved in the discrimination between self-produced and foreign vocalization on the basis of a vocalmotor feedforward mechanism.

Acoustic Stimulation↗