Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 856512

Knee ligament injuries: a standardized evaluation method.

Abstract

An analysis of the data with total scores in non-acute terms obtained from 280 patients suggests that knee injuries can be evaluated as: Good-Excellent=generally normal or near normal function, with few or no signs and minimal symptomatology, 41-50 points; Fair (+)=slight functional disability, with few signs and mild symptomatology, 36-40 points; Fair (-)=moderate functional disability, with significant clinical signs and moderate symptomatology, 31-35 points; Poor=severely disabled, with marked signs and symptoms of a compromised knee, less than 30 points. These gross categorizations correlate well with the patient's own evaluations of his condition and the physicians' clinical assessment of the status of a given knee. Although the majority of patients have been followed for four years or less with this method, it is felt that the method presented has provided: A consistency and organization of the workup, diagnosis, treatment, and study of knee ligament injuries, not previously available at our institution; an objective measure of individual patient response to treatment and eventual recovery; in general, more objective means of assessing modalities of therapy and modes of primary repair and reconstruction of ligaments; a tool facilitating communication both among physicians and between physicians and patient; a means by which the long term follow-up of an individual patient by more than one physician can become a more efficient undertaking; an increasing data bank of standardized observations from which many ideas are yet to evolve; and most importantly, an improvement and the means possible for further improvement in the care rendered patients with knee ligament injuries; also, the present computerized format has given rise to additional benefits not directly related to the immediate problem of knee ligament injury. One such benefit is the ability to request and receive rapidly, a concise, yet complete legal summary of a patient's hospital course.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Marshall, J F Fetto, P M Botero. Knee ligament injuries: a standardized evaluation method.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/856512/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Injuries in Swedish skydiving.

OBJECTIVE: To create a basis for prevention of modern skydiving injuries. DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study. SETTING: National total material. PATIENTS: Data on all reported injury events (n = 257) in Swedish skydiving 1999-2003 (total 539,885 jumps) were retrieved from the Swedish Parachute Association. Non-fatally injured skydivers were sent a questionnaire asking for event and injury details (response rate 89%), and supplementary hospital records were retrieved for the most serious injuries (n = 85). Human, equipment and environmental factors were assessed for risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Frequency and severity of injuries. RESULTS: Incidence of non-fatal injury events was 48 per 100,000 jumps. The lower extremities, spine and shoulders were important regions of injury. The most serious injuries were experienced by licensed skydivers, but students in training had a higher injury rate and more often left the sport because of the injury. Of two student-training systems, one had an incidence less than half that of the other. CONCLUSIONS: A basis for prevention was created, showing a potential for reduction of frequency and severity of injuries with training and technical interventions.

Athletic Injuries↗

Screening for catastrophic neck injuries in sports.

The cervical spine is prone to injury due to the structure of the articulating vertebrae at the level of C4-C6, where the spinal cord occupies more of the spinal canal. Cervical spine injuries can occur in all sports and all ages. Participation in contact sports certainly increases the possibility of cervical spine injuries. In screening for catastrophic neck injuries it is vital to examine incidence and injury surveillance statistics in sports. These data can help determine sport-specific preponderance of catastrophic injury. Screening methods for predisposition to catastrophic cervical spine injuries include a concise history, physical examination, and radiographic methods. There is currently no universal classification system utilizing imaging of the cervical spine that has been validated as a screening method for catastrophic neck injuries.

Athletic Injuries↗