Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8564990

Intestinal obstruction.

Abstract

Intestinal obstruction is a common and distressing complication for patients with advanced abdominal or pelvic cancer. Many of these patients are unfit for surgery due to extensive local disease or poor general condition. There are now many drug regimens available that will relieve obstructive symptoms in most patients, although a few, mainly with high obstruction, will require a venting procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Baines. 1994. Intestinal obstruction.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8564990/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Intraabdominal desmoplastic small cell tumor. Report and discussion of five cases.

BACKGROUND: Intraabdominal desmoplastic small cell tumor is a rare malignancy that has only recently been described. In the adult population, it is usually seen in young males. The tumor appears to arise as a dominant mass or masses in the abdominal cavity, particularly in the pelvic region, without a clear visceral origin. Multiple small tumor nodules may be found attached to the peritoneal surface. Visceral metastases occur late in the clinical course, ultimately leading to the patient's death. Five young adults with intraabdominal desmoplastic small cell tumors were treated with aggressive chemotherapy. METHODS: Charts of five patients treated between 1990 and 1995 were reviewed. The diagnosis of desmoplastic small cell tumor was made on the basis of typical clinical and radiographic findings, light microscopy showing hyperchromatic cells surrounded by a desmoplastic stroma, and immunohistochemistry demonstrating markers of epithelial and mesenchymal differentiation. Patients were treated with aggressive combination chemotherapy consisting of alternating regimens similar to those used as testis cancer salvage therapy. RESULTS: Four of the five patients demonstrated a partial response to chemotherapy. Two of the responding patients had surgery with the intent of removing all residual disease, but this was successful in only one case. All patients have died from their cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Intraabdominal desmoplastic small cell tumors are sensitive to combination chemotherapy. It appears that treatment offers good palliation and may prolong survival in isolated cases. However, even the patients managed with the most aggressive medical and surgical approaches are not cured and ultimately die of their disease.

Abdominal Neoplasms

Uncertainties in CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning associated with patient breathing.

PURPOSE: To evaluate uncertainties associated with treatment-planning computed tomography (CT) data obtained with the patient breathing freely. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with thoracic or abdominal tumors underwent a standard treatment-planning CT study while breathing quietly and freely, followed by CT scans while holding their breath at normal inhalation and normal exhalation. Identical treatment plans on all three CT data sets for each patient pointed out differences in: (a) radiation path lengths; (b) positions of the organs; (c) physical volumes of the lung, liver, and kidneys; (d) the interpretation of plan evaluation tools such as dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models; and (e) how well the planning CT data set represented the average of the inhalation and exhalation studies. RESULTS: Inhalation and exhalation data differ in terms of radiation path length (nearly one quarter of the cases had path-length differences > 1 cm), although the free breathing and average path lengths do not exhibit large differences (0-9 mm). Liver and kidney movements averaged 2 cm, whereas differences between the free breathing and average positions averaged 0.6 cm. The physical volume of the liver between the free breathing and static studies varied by as much as 12%. The NTCP calculations on exhale and inhale studies varied from 3 to 43% for doses that resulted in a 15% NTCP on the free-breathing studies. CONCLUSION: Free-breathing CT studies may improperly estimate the position and volume of critical structures, and thus may mislead evaluation of plans based on such volume dependent criteria such as dose-volume histograms and NTCP calculations.

Abdominal Neoplasms